Facebook, Princeton the Target of 3-D Object Data Suit from Home Design Site
UAB “PLANNER5D,” the private Lithuanian company behind the Planner 5D website, sued Facebook and Princeton over claims they took valuable data from more than 2,500 three-dimensional objects and 45,000 scenes vital to the development of computer vision technology.
June 07, 2019 at 01:00 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
Facebook Inc. and Princeton University have been hit with claims from a home design website that they scraped data from more than 2,500 three-dimensional objects and 45,000 scenes vital to the development of computer vision technology.
UAB “PLANNER5D,” the private Lithuanian company behind the Planner 5D website, sued Facebook and Princeton for copyright infringement and trade secret theft in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on Thursday.
“Defendants' copying, misappropriation, and especially public disclosure and dissemination of Planner 5D's design files threatens to destroy the market for Planner 5D's core asset,” wrote the company's lawyers. “It has inflicted catastrophic and potentially permanent damage on the company,” they wrote.
Representatives of the company and the university didn't immediately respond to messages Thursday. Planner 5D's lawyer, Marc Bernstein of The Business Litigation Group in San Francisco, said in a phone interview Thursday the company is considering adding more individual, university and corporate defendants as it learns more about how the data was scraped and shared.
“The company takes this seriously because they consider this a significant threat, and they think this data is a key ingredient for scene recognition research,” he said.
According to the complaint, Princeton researchers working in the computer vision field studying ways to give machines the ability to recognize three-dimensional scenes had identified a lack of data as a significant hurdle within the field. The complaint claims that Princeton researchers developed a data set built from scraping Planner 5D's library of object and scene files, a practice which is banned in the company's user agreement. Planner 5D's library took more than seven years and millions of dollars to create. The suit says that the data set, named SUNCG by the Princeton researchers, is 99.9% identical to files in Planner 5D's collection.
Planner 5D's lawyers further claim that the SUNCG data set has been copied and distributed as part of the Scene Understanding and Modeling (SUMO) Challenge, a Facebook-backed competition aimed at developing “3D scene understanding and modeling algorithms.”
“Like Princeton, Facebook is exploiting the Planner 5D dataset for the same purpose Planner 5D has set for itself: to train artificial intelligence applications to recognize 3D interior scenes,” wrote the company's lawyers. “Worse, Facebook explicitly secured from SUMO Challenge participants the right to commercialize the fruits of their work. This strikes at the heart of Planner 5D's business objective,” they wrote.
The suit claims that Planner 5D didn't learn of SUNCG until 2018 and that the company asked Princeton, Facebook and others to cease and desist from using its copyrighted material in March 2019. A link to the SUNCG data set on the SUMO Challenge website currently redirects those who click on it to the Princeton home page. Berstein said Thursday that the link had been rerouted after Planner 5D's cease-and-desist request. He declined to say how the company learned of the SUNCG data set's existence.
The suit brings claims of copyright infringement as well as claims of trade secret misappropriation under both the federal Defend Trade Secrets Act and the California Uniform Trade Secrets Act against Facebook and Princeton, as well as unnamed individual, corporate and university defendants.
Read the complaint:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1For Safer Traffic Stops, Replace Paper Documents With ‘Contactless’ Tech
- 2As Second Trump Administration Approaches, Businesses Brace for Sweeping Changes to Immigration Policy
- 3General Warrants and ESI
- 4GC Pleads Guilty to Embezzling $7.4 Million From 3 Banks
- 5Authenticating Electronic Signatures
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250