Facebook, Princeton the Target of 3-D Object Data Suit from Home Design Site
UAB “PLANNER5D,” the private Lithuanian company behind the Planner 5D website, sued Facebook and Princeton over claims they took valuable data from more than 2,500 three-dimensional objects and 45,000 scenes vital to the development of computer vision technology.
June 07, 2019 at 01:00 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
An attendee wears the Oculus VR Inc. Rift S virtual reality (VR) headset and controllers during the F8 Developers Conference in San Jose, California, on April 30, 2019. Photographer: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg
Facebook Inc. and Princeton University have been hit with claims from a home design website that they scraped data from more than 2,500 three-dimensional objects and 45,000 scenes vital to the development of computer vision technology.
UAB “PLANNER5D,” the private Lithuanian company behind the Planner 5D website, sued Facebook and Princeton for copyright infringement and trade secret theft in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on Thursday.
“Defendants' copying, misappropriation, and especially public disclosure and dissemination of Planner 5D's design files threatens to destroy the market for Planner 5D's core asset,” wrote the company's lawyers. “It has inflicted catastrophic and potentially permanent damage on the company,” they wrote.
Representatives of the company and the university didn't immediately respond to messages Thursday. Planner 5D's lawyer, Marc Bernstein of The Business Litigation Group in San Francisco, said in a phone interview Thursday the company is considering adding more individual, university and corporate defendants as it learns more about how the data was scraped and shared.
“The company takes this seriously because they consider this a significant threat, and they think this data is a key ingredient for scene recognition research,” he said.
According to the complaint, Princeton researchers working in the computer vision field studying ways to give machines the ability to recognize three-dimensional scenes had identified a lack of data as a significant hurdle within the field. The complaint claims that Princeton researchers developed a data set built from scraping Planner 5D's library of object and scene files, a practice which is banned in the company's user agreement. Planner 5D's library took more than seven years and millions of dollars to create. The suit says that the data set, named SUNCG by the Princeton researchers, is 99.9% identical to files in Planner 5D's collection.
Planner 5D's lawyers further claim that the SUNCG data set has been copied and distributed as part of the Scene Understanding and Modeling (SUMO) Challenge, a Facebook-backed competition aimed at developing “3D scene understanding and modeling algorithms.”
“Like Princeton, Facebook is exploiting the Planner 5D dataset for the same purpose Planner 5D has set for itself: to train artificial intelligence applications to recognize 3D interior scenes,” wrote the company's lawyers. “Worse, Facebook explicitly secured from SUMO Challenge participants the right to commercialize the fruits of their work. This strikes at the heart of Planner 5D's business objective,” they wrote.
The suit claims that Planner 5D didn't learn of SUNCG until 2018 and that the company asked Princeton, Facebook and others to cease and desist from using its copyrighted material in March 2019. A link to the SUNCG data set on the SUMO Challenge website currently redirects those who click on it to the Princeton home page. Berstein said Thursday that the link had been rerouted after Planner 5D's cease-and-desist request. He declined to say how the company learned of the SUNCG data set's existence.
The suit brings claims of copyright infringement as well as claims of trade secret misappropriation under both the federal Defend Trade Secrets Act and the California Uniform Trade Secrets Act against Facebook and Princeton, as well as unnamed individual, corporate and university defendants.
Read the complaint:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Rejuvenation of a Sharp Employer Non-Compete Tool: Delaware Supreme Court Reinvigorates the Employee Choice Doctrine
- 2Mastering Litigation in New York’s Commercial Division Part V, Leave It to the Experts: Expert Discovery in the New York Commercial Division
- 3GOP-Led SEC Tightens Control Over Enforcement Investigations, Lawyers Say
- 4Transgender Care Fight Targets More Adults as Georgia, Other States Weigh Laws
- 5Roundup Special Master's Report Recommends Lead Counsel Get $0 in Common Benefit Fees
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250