US and EU Begin Negotiations for E-Evidence Agreement
If the negotiations are successful, European authorities would be able to access evidence needed for criminal cases more quickly than they can now and U.S.-based service providers would not have to worry about violating EU data protection rules when providing evidence related to European nationals.
June 07, 2019 at 02:00 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
The European Union has given the green light to negotiations with the U.S. for an agreement to speed up the exchange of electronic evidence in criminal cases.
If the negotiations are successful, European authorities would be able to access evidence needed for criminal cases more quickly than they can now. And service providers would not have to worry about violating EU data protection rules when providing evidence regarding EU citizens.
With such an agreement, U.S.-based service providers would be obliged to cooperate with EU authorities and provide them with emails and documents stored in the Cloud, for example. Currently, U.S. providers respond to requests for information on a voluntary basis.
Following lengthy internal discussions, the 28 national governments of the EU, meeting in the Council of Ministers, agreed Thursday to give the European Commission a mandate to negotiate an agreement with the U.S. on facilitating access to e-evidence.
“Criminals don't stop at Europe's borders. Nowadays, they use fast and modern technologies to organise their illegal activities and erase their path afterwards,” Ana Birchall, the Romanian minister of justice who chaired the meeting, said in a statement. “A lot of the data needed to track down these criminals is stored in the U.S. or by U.S. companies. An EU-U.S. agreement to speed up the access of our law enforcement authorities to e-evidence is therefore of utmost importance.”
If an agreement is reached with the U.S., it would create a cooperation framework including direct cooperation with services providers. It would shorten the time required for authorities to obtain requested information to 10 days, whereas the average time taken at the moment is 10 months.
The Commission said in a statement that electronic evidence was needed in around 85% of criminal investigations, and in two-thirds of these investigations there was a need to obtain evidence from online service providers based in another country. Currently, the largest service providers have their headquarters in the U.S.
The agreement would mean that the U..S would treat all requests from members of the EU equally. Until now, the U.S. has preferred to strike deals with individual EU countries.
The U.K., Ireland and Denmark would not be covered by this agreement as they have opt-outs from EU criminal cooperation rules. They would seek their own deals with the U.S., which would be identical in scope and content to any EU-U.S. deal.
On the U.S. side, service providers are keen for the government to reach a deal with the EU because any requests made in the U.S. for evidence regarding EU citizens have to comply with EU data protection rules. This often presents a burden and legal risk for U.S. companies.
Negotiations with the U.S. are due to start later this month but are expected to take a considerable amount of time to conclude.
In addition, the Council gave the Commission a mandate to start negotiations for signing up to a new protocol to the Budapest Convention on Cybercrime. This protocol includes provisions for a simplified mutual legal assistance regime and allows direct cooperation with service providers in other countries that are parties to the Convention. Negotiations on the Protocol have already started.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Understanding the HEMS Standard in Trusts
- 2Mergers Are About People, Not Paperwork: Here’s Why
- 3Wachtell Partner Leaves to Chair Latham's Liability Management Practice
- 4Morris Nichols Partners to Be Involved With PLI Program
- 5How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'Cultivating a Culture of Mutual Trust Is Essential,' Says Gina Piazza of Tarter Krinsky & Drogin
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250