US and EU Begin Negotiations for E-Evidence Agreement
If the negotiations are successful, European authorities would be able to access evidence needed for criminal cases more quickly than they can now and U.S.-based service providers would not have to worry about violating EU data protection rules when providing evidence related to European nationals.
June 07, 2019 at 02:00 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
The European Union has given the green light to negotiations with the U.S. for an agreement to speed up the exchange of electronic evidence in criminal cases.
If the negotiations are successful, European authorities would be able to access evidence needed for criminal cases more quickly than they can now. And service providers would not have to worry about violating EU data protection rules when providing evidence regarding EU citizens.
With such an agreement, U.S.-based service providers would be obliged to cooperate with EU authorities and provide them with emails and documents stored in the Cloud, for example. Currently, U.S. providers respond to requests for information on a voluntary basis.
Following lengthy internal discussions, the 28 national governments of the EU, meeting in the Council of Ministers, agreed Thursday to give the European Commission a mandate to negotiate an agreement with the U.S. on facilitating access to e-evidence.
“Criminals don't stop at Europe's borders. Nowadays, they use fast and modern technologies to organise their illegal activities and erase their path afterwards,” Ana Birchall, the Romanian minister of justice who chaired the meeting, said in a statement. “A lot of the data needed to track down these criminals is stored in the U.S. or by U.S. companies. An EU-U.S. agreement to speed up the access of our law enforcement authorities to e-evidence is therefore of utmost importance.”
If an agreement is reached with the U.S., it would create a cooperation framework including direct cooperation with services providers. It would shorten the time required for authorities to obtain requested information to 10 days, whereas the average time taken at the moment is 10 months.
The Commission said in a statement that electronic evidence was needed in around 85% of criminal investigations, and in two-thirds of these investigations there was a need to obtain evidence from online service providers based in another country. Currently, the largest service providers have their headquarters in the U.S.
The agreement would mean that the U..S would treat all requests from members of the EU equally. Until now, the U.S. has preferred to strike deals with individual EU countries.
The U.K., Ireland and Denmark would not be covered by this agreement as they have opt-outs from EU criminal cooperation rules. They would seek their own deals with the U.S., which would be identical in scope and content to any EU-U.S. deal.
On the U.S. side, service providers are keen for the government to reach a deal with the EU because any requests made in the U.S. for evidence regarding EU citizens have to comply with EU data protection rules. This often presents a burden and legal risk for U.S. companies.
Negotiations with the U.S. are due to start later this month but are expected to take a considerable amount of time to conclude.
In addition, the Council gave the Commission a mandate to start negotiations for signing up to a new protocol to the Budapest Convention on Cybercrime. This protocol includes provisions for a simplified mutual legal assistance regime and allows direct cooperation with service providers in other countries that are parties to the Convention. Negotiations on the Protocol have already started.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250