Exterro Acquires Jordan Lawrence, Signaling Expansion Into Privacy
The acquisition follow Exterro's 2018 large-scale investment from Leeds Equity Partners. Exterro CEO and president Bobby Balachandran told LTN, “I believe e-discovery needs to reckon with the changing landscape of data privacy regulations.”
June 11, 2019 at 11:12 AM
4 minute read
When e-discovery company Exterro received its first institutional investor in May 2018, CEO and president Bobby Balachandran said he saw “a lot of really good opportunities in the market to provide even more value to our customers sooner than if we built it on our own.” One of the first of those opportunities has come to bear—and perhaps surprisingly, outside of e-discovery.
Exterro announced on Tuesday the acquisition of data privacy and information management software company Jordan Lawrence. With a particular focus on data inventory, minimization and governance, Jordan Lawrence in 2018 was named the Association of Corporate Counsel's exclusive Alliance Partner for data privacy and cybersecurity compliance.
No financial details for the transaction have been disclosed. Jordan Lawrence's employees have been absorbed into Exterro, and the two companies' respective software have begun to be integrated. Jordan Lawrence is expected to keep its own branding for the immediate future, as the company's website has been rebranded to say “Jordan Lawrence: An Exterro Company.”
Speaking with Legaltech News Tuesday, Balachandran noted that both the e-discovery industry and the economy at large are “facing large-scale, structural change in how we interact with our data,” and the wish to be at the forefront of that change was behind the acquisition.
“I believe e-discovery needs to reckon with the changing landscape of data privacy regulations. GDPR is just the tip of the spear,” he said. “The California Consumer Protection Act, the New York Department of Financial Services Cybersecurity Regulation, and likely many more state regulations are on their way. Legal teams must make sure their e-discovery preservation and information governance programs comply with these regulations, or they will be opening their organization up to layers upon layers of lawsuits.”
In the press release announcing the deal, Exterro noted that the companies' combined software will be expected to access, identify, and locate all responsive data; assess, inventory and map their data; manage, preserve, remove, collect or make portable their data; and document and manage the workflows associated with their data responsibilities and requirements.
Balachandran called Jordan Lawrence's software a “perfect complement” to Exterro's existing solution, noting that many e-discovery and privacy tasks are “for all intents and purposes, identical. Both require an accurate and comprehensive data map, the ability to identify and preserve data across a wide variety of data sources, and the ability to review, redact, and produce relevant data under tight timelines.”
In the release announcing the deal, Alice Lawrence, principal at Jordan Lawrence, also pointed to the wide options available at Exterro as a catalyst for the deal. She explained, “One of the reasons we are thrilled to be a part of Exterro is having access to their large, innovative development organization. Our joint clients will benefit from a software platform that unites data inventory, e-discovery, and information governance solutions in one place.”
Pre-existing Jordan Lawrence customers will now have access to wider Exterro e-discovery capabilities. Balachandran pointed out in particular that Jordan Lawrence legal hold customers will be migrated to Exterro's legal hold platform. And the combination, he said, should be more than “a simple bolt-on acquisition.”
“Organizations will need a portal for data subject access requests, but that's just the front end,” he explained. “More importantly, they need a holistic information governance plan to understand the data in a contextual manner, and the ability to preserve, collect, review, redact, produce or remediate information—all on demand, in an efficient business process. And that's where Exterro fits into the picture.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Cars Reach Record Fuel Economy but Largely Fail to Meet Biden's EPA Standard, Agency Says
- 2How Cybercriminals Exploit Law Firms’ Holiday Vulnerabilities
- 3DOJ Asks 5th Circuit to Publish Opinion Upholding Gun Ban for Felon
- 4GEO Group Sued Over 2 Wrongful Deaths
- 5Revenue Up at Homegrown Texas Firms Through Q3, Though Demand Slipped Slightly
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250