Outside Small Law, Google's G Suite Struggles to Gain Legal Foothold
G Suite is finding a home, albeit a short-term one, in small and solo practitioner law firms. Larger law firms in contrast are avoiding G Suite to better manage documents to their standards.
June 14, 2019 at 11:30 AM
4 minute read
While Google products may be ubiquitous among consumers, it's a different story in the legal market. While some solo practitioners and small law firms are using G Suite for their work, as their practice and client demands intensify, many are turning to legal-specific practice management platforms, lawyers and tech consultants said. Meanwhile, G Suite is largely shut out from midsize and larger firms chiefly because of document management concerns.
Google's G Suite includes its cloud-based Docs, Sheets, Slides and Calendar apps, the option for a business email address, and other features. Starting at $6 a month, G Suite's price point, ease and familiarity can appeal to a small law firm or solo practitioner busy starting their new law office.
Brett Burney of Burney Consultants said the professionalism of sending work emails from a firm domain address, and not the generic “@gmail.com,” is enough for some lawyers to switch to G Suite.
He also explained a law firm can pay, through G Suite, to improve the confidentiality of sharing their data in Gmail, Calendar and Google Docs. “That's simply a cost of business you should do to enjoy the confidentiality of using G Suite.”
Still, a few solo practitioners and small firms don't make the jump to G Suite and continue using Google's free Gmail and other apps for their practice because of a lack of time or understanding of the potential harm, lawyers and technology consultants said.
“They haven't taken the time to educate themselves about the security and privacy concerns because they are worried about cost or ease,” said Edward Zohn of two-lawyer firm Zohn & Zohn and chair of the New Jersey State Bar Association's solo and small firm section. “That sounds a little harsh but once you start with something it's really hard to change. It's hard to change your habits, and attorneys are sometimes resistant to change because they are busy practicing law and they don't want to revamp and learn how to do something new.”
Midsize and larger law firms, meanwhile, are more likely to refuse to use G Suite because of document management and cybersecurity apprehensions, according to law firms contacted by Legaltech News.
“Our focus has really been on using the systems that the firm has so that we have the ability to apply our information governance standards,” wrote Kelley Drye & Warren chief information officer Judith Flournoy in an email. “If we allow the use of G Suite, we lose that control.”
Akerman chief information officer Danny Rhinehart echoed Flournoy's document management apprehension, voicing concerns regarding G Suite's cybersecurity for his firm's 700 attorneys.
“G Suite does not have the granular security requirements or data loss prevention functionality we require,” Rhinehart wrote in an email. He added, “Google is an advertising company, and we don't trust them with our data.”
Those concerns can also be felt by small and solo firms, and as their practice grows, tech consultants said many begin to integrate legal practice management platforms into G Suite.
“We do see it a little bit with using Gmail and Google Docs in the small law firm arena,” observed Josh Taylor, an attorney and legal content marketing manager for law practice management software company Smokeball Inc. He added that using G suite “whets their appetite” for software geared specifically toward the legal industry.
Of course, how much a small or solo firm uses G Suite can depend on their clients. Take for example Houston-based solo practitioner Melanie Bragg, who chairs the American Bar Association's solo, small firm and general practice division. She said she uses Gmail primarily for email management and praised G Suite's synchronization to various platforms as an integral part of her business.
But the Houston lawyer revealed she's beginning to leverage Dropbox more frequently over G Suite's Google Drive for her file sharing because it's what her clients and colleagues use.
The American Bar Association's 2018 TechReport found that of lawyers who reported they used cloud computing for work-related tasks, 60% said they used Dropbox, a strong lead over the second-most reported Google Docs (36%).
To lawyers Zohn and Bragg, heads of their respective solo and small law firm associations, Dropbox is easily the more widely used cloud-based service in their market segment.
“Dropbox and G Suite aren't the same, they are different paradigms,” Zohn said. “Dropbox is just a big disc drive and to a lot of people that's it's appeal, to me that's its appeal.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1ACC CLO Survey Waves Warning Flags for Boards
- 2States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 3Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 4Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 5Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250