Outside Small Law, Google's G Suite Struggles to Gain Legal Foothold
G Suite is finding a home, albeit a short-term one, in small and solo practitioner law firms. Larger law firms in contrast are avoiding G Suite to better manage documents to their standards.
June 14, 2019 at 11:30 AM
4 minute read
While Google products may be ubiquitous among consumers, it's a different story in the legal market. While some solo practitioners and small law firms are using G Suite for their work, as their practice and client demands intensify, many are turning to legal-specific practice management platforms, lawyers and tech consultants said. Meanwhile, G Suite is largely shut out from midsize and larger firms chiefly because of document management concerns.
Google's G Suite includes its cloud-based Docs, Sheets, Slides and Calendar apps, the option for a business email address, and other features. Starting at $6 a month, G Suite's price point, ease and familiarity can appeal to a small law firm or solo practitioner busy starting their new law office.
Brett Burney of Burney Consultants said the professionalism of sending work emails from a firm domain address, and not the generic “@gmail.com,” is enough for some lawyers to switch to G Suite.
He also explained a law firm can pay, through G Suite, to improve the confidentiality of sharing their data in Gmail, Calendar and Google Docs. “That's simply a cost of business you should do to enjoy the confidentiality of using G Suite.”
Still, a few solo practitioners and small firms don't make the jump to G Suite and continue using Google's free Gmail and other apps for their practice because of a lack of time or understanding of the potential harm, lawyers and technology consultants said.
“They haven't taken the time to educate themselves about the security and privacy concerns because they are worried about cost or ease,” said Edward Zohn of two-lawyer firm Zohn & Zohn and chair of the New Jersey State Bar Association's solo and small firm section. “That sounds a little harsh but once you start with something it's really hard to change. It's hard to change your habits, and attorneys are sometimes resistant to change because they are busy practicing law and they don't want to revamp and learn how to do something new.”
Midsize and larger law firms, meanwhile, are more likely to refuse to use G Suite because of document management and cybersecurity apprehensions, according to law firms contacted by Legaltech News.
“Our focus has really been on using the systems that the firm has so that we have the ability to apply our information governance standards,” wrote Kelley Drye & Warren chief information officer Judith Flournoy in an email. “If we allow the use of G Suite, we lose that control.”
Akerman chief information officer Danny Rhinehart echoed Flournoy's document management apprehension, voicing concerns regarding G Suite's cybersecurity for his firm's 700 attorneys.
“G Suite does not have the granular security requirements or data loss prevention functionality we require,” Rhinehart wrote in an email. He added, “Google is an advertising company, and we don't trust them with our data.”
Those concerns can also be felt by small and solo firms, and as their practice grows, tech consultants said many begin to integrate legal practice management platforms into G Suite.
“We do see it a little bit with using Gmail and Google Docs in the small law firm arena,” observed Josh Taylor, an attorney and legal content marketing manager for law practice management software company Smokeball Inc. He added that using G suite “whets their appetite” for software geared specifically toward the legal industry.
Of course, how much a small or solo firm uses G Suite can depend on their clients. Take for example Houston-based solo practitioner Melanie Bragg, who chairs the American Bar Association's solo, small firm and general practice division. She said she uses Gmail primarily for email management and praised G Suite's synchronization to various platforms as an integral part of her business.
But the Houston lawyer revealed she's beginning to leverage Dropbox more frequently over G Suite's Google Drive for her file sharing because it's what her clients and colleagues use.
The American Bar Association's 2018 TechReport found that of lawyers who reported they used cloud computing for work-related tasks, 60% said they used Dropbox, a strong lead over the second-most reported Google Docs (36%).
To lawyers Zohn and Bragg, heads of their respective solo and small law firm associations, Dropbox is easily the more widely used cloud-based service in their market segment.
“Dropbox and G Suite aren't the same, they are different paradigms,” Zohn said. “Dropbox is just a big disc drive and to a lot of people that's it's appeal, to me that's its appeal.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250