Litify Raises $50 Million, Eyeing Expansion Into Corporate Legal, Mid-Sized Firms
After focusing on plaintiffs firms for roughly two years, Litify is now streamlining its technology to appeal to corporate legal departments and small and midsize firms.
June 17, 2019 at 10:00 AM
3 minute read
Practice management software company Litify announced it has secured a $50 million Series A investment, and it aims to use the capital to expand into corporate legal departments and small and midsize firms.
The early June announcement came roughly a year after Litify raised $2.5 million from investor Esquire Financial Holdings, a holding company for professional and legal services-facing Esquire Bank in May 2018. Along with its investment, Esquire Financial Holdings also acquired a 5% ownership interest in Litify.
This latest $50 million funding was made by investment firm Tiger Global Management, which is now a shareholder in the company. Litify founder Reuven Moskowitz said the company will address the transparency, automation, efficiency and client experience concerns of corporate legal departments and small and midsize firms.
“When we started Litify, we believed that the broader legal tech market was really in need of disruption, and the problems we solved over the last two or so years in the plaintiffs market are what lawyers everywhere face,” Moskowitz said.
Up until now, mostly plaintiffs firms have leveraged Litify's cloud-based features that include detailing client intake; storing, accessing and managing a legal matter's documents; and data analysis.
While Moskowitz has prior experience with plaintiffs attorneys, and is currently COO of personal injury firm Morgan & Morgan, he noted that Litify will bring its solution to the broader legal industry with preconfigured tools and templates that are “lightweight but enterprise-level tools so they can scale.”
Moskowitz explained there's “a competitive advantage to have that enterprise-level feature in a straightforward and easy fashion for firms that are still growing.”
Litify joins a long list of practice management software providers including Clio, MyCase and Rocket Matter that are targeting midmarket and boutique law firms. However Moskowitz said his company differs because it provides enterprise-level solutions without much technical expertise required to set up and deploy.
He noted that a platform's ease of use and integration with multiple applications is valued by law firms. Indeed, similar to Litify, many other companies have touted and expanded their integrations with other platforms as a key selling point to clients and potential investors.
Earlier this month, knowledge management and e-discovery startup Onna announced it raised $11 million from investors that included Dropbox and Slack. In an interview with Legaltech News, Onna founder and CEO Salim Elkhou said the company plans to add additional integrations for clients to quickly collect and search data. Likewise, Bill4Time branched out from solely offering time management solutions to developing practice management solutions that cover a legal matter from client intake to final billing invoices. Similarly, during ILTACON 2018, OpenText announced it was streamlining how it produces and sells legal products to offer clients a “one-stop-shop” suite of legal tools.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1'Politically Destabilizing': Trump Lawyers Say NY Criminal Case Must be Dismissed
- 2DLA Piper Sued by 2 Houston Companies, Alleging a 'Fake Lawyer' Represented Them in Argentina
- 3Critical Mass With Law.com’s Amanda Bronstad: Schools Score Again in Suits Against Social Media, Johnson & Johnson Subsidiary Seeks Sanctions Over Andy Birchfield’s Deposition
- 4Southern District Refuses to Grant Summary Judgment Due to Lack of Documentary Evidence Demonstrating that Insured's Misrepresentations Were Material
- 5People in the News—Nov. 20, 2024—Rawle & Henderson, Panitch Schwarze
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250