New York AG Backs 'Modern' Data Breach Protection Act Passed by State Legislature
The act's measure applies the state's data-breach notification requirement to any person or entity with a state resident's private information, instead of applying it only to those conducting business in the state. The bill now moves to Gov. Andrew Cuomo's desk.
June 19, 2019 at 11:48 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
State lawmakers have passed legislation that would “modernize” and update consumer data protections and expand New York Attorney General Letitia James' oversight of data breaches affecting New Yorkers, according to a news release issued by James “applauding” the act's passage.
Called the “Stop Hacks and Improve Electronic Data Security Act,” or SHIELD Act, the bill now moves to Gov. Andrew Cuomo's desk for his decision on whether to sign it into law.
The legislation, first introduced by the Attorney General's Office in 2017 after the Equifax Inc. data breach compromised some 145.5 million Americans' personal information, includes a number of measures aimed at enhancing protections for New Yorkers, including applying the state's data breach notification requirement to any person or entity with a state resident's private information, instead of applying it only to those conducting business in the state, James' office said.
In addition, the act broadens the definition of a data breach to include unauthorized persons who gain access to private information, rather than using the current “acquired standard,” the news release said. The legislation also expands the scope of information subject to the state's notification law to include biometric information, email addresses and corresponding passwords, or security questions and answers.
“[M]y office has been working hard this session to modernize our outdated laws governing data breaches,” James said in the news release. “This bill is an important step forward providing greater protection for consumer's private information and holding companies accountable for securing that data.”
The news release noted that under current law, entities that collect private information must give notice to the Attorney General's Office when there is a data breach, as the office is the lone enforcer of the state's data breach law found in General Business Law 899-aa.
James' office then said that “given the evolution of how individuals use and disseminate private information, the Office of the Attorney General submitted the SHIELD Act as an agency program bill in order to update the current statute to keep pace.”
The act was first introduced under former Attorney General Eric Schneiderman following the massive Equifax breach, which reportedly compromised the personal information of more than 8 million New Yorkers.
James' office further noted that if the legislation is made into law, New York would join an “increasing number of states that require reasonable data security protections, while being careful to avoid excessive costs to small business and without imposing duplicate obligations under federal or state data security regulations.”
The act's data security requirements are “tailored to the size of a business,” the release said.
“The SHIELD Act will put strong safeguards in place to curb data breaches and identity theft,” said Justin Brookman, director of privacy and technology policy for Consumer Reports, in James' news release.
He added, “This is a big win in the fight to improve data security for the people of New York, and it helps build momentum for reforms nationwide.”
The legislative sponsors for the bill were state Sen. Kevin Thomas and Assemblymen Michael DenDekke, the news release said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Chief Judge Joins Panel Exploring Causes for Public's Eroding Faith in NY Legal System
- 2Pogo Stick Maker Wants Financing Company to Pay $20M After Bailing Out Client
- 3Goldman Sachs Secures Dismissal of Celebrity Manager's Lawsuit Over Failed Deal
- 4Trump Moves to Withdraw Applications to Halt Now-Completed Sentencing
- 5Trump's RTO Mandate May Have Some Gov't Lawyers Polishing Their Resumes
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250