FoundationLab Launches Tech Prototyping Service As Legal Eyes Developer Role
FoundationLab, a legal product design studio, has launched a new subscription service that allows law firms and corporate legal departments to explore ideas for innovation without the risk of developing an idea too far, too fast.
June 20, 2019 at 09:30 AM
3 minute read
Legal product design studio FoundationLab has launched a new prototyping subscription service geared towards bridging the chasm between the idea stage and an actual end result.
Say a firm wants to develop a product or solution that could help smooth out the process of collaborating on a matter involving multinational parties. Prototyping could provide a better sense of how a product might look or function once fully executed, and before the firm has gone to the trouble and expense of actually bringing that vision to life.
“I would say legal prototyping in general is a very light-weight way to test ideas and get real feedback,” said Mike Cappucci, a partner at FoundationLab.
For law firms and legal departments, the drive to innovate is a very real thing. The first-ever conference thrown by the Association of Legal Technologists (ALT), held earlier this year in Scottsdale, Arizona, even constructed an entire theme around “legal design thinking.”
The term was coined by Margaret Hagan, director of Stanford University's Legal Design Lab, which creates concept designs for legal products and refers to the process of addressing legal problems with creative solutions.
But sometimes those ideas never make it beyond the idea phase and into reality, either because nobody was sure what the next step on the ladder was or didn't want to spend the money to find out.
“I think for us legal prototyping as a concept is really geared towards reducing risk which is an important metric for lawyers,” Cappucci said “They're quite risk averse so being able to get something out there that gets you legitimate feedback on whether the innovation opportunity that you're considering pursuing is worthwhile as opposed to running the idea through your own head over and over again.
Subscribers are entitled to one prototype design a month and how the process unfolds will vary slightly depending on the firm or legal department involved. Some firms or legal departments may already have a curated list of ideas they want to explore. If not, FoundationLab will start there.
“The subscription enables them to have a tool that every month they utilize to work through that list of ideas,” Cappucci said.
Discussions start off loosely and gradually zero-in on the “why” of an idea. If the underlying goal of a project is found to actually mesh with the solution that's being proposed, FoundationLab can go off and prototype a design for feedback.
Still, they aren't the first company out there to offer legal departments an outlet for ideas. In 2015, Riverview Law, now a part of EY, also launched a prototype consultancy to clients develop their own automated processes for legal work.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Big Law Firms Sheppard Mullin, Morgan Lewis and Baker Botts Add Partners in Houston
- 2Lack of Jurisdiction Dooms Child Sex Abuse Claim Against Archdiocese of Philadelphia, says NJ Supreme Court
- 3DC Lawsuits Seek to Prevent Mass Firings and Public Naming of FBI Agents
- 4Growth of California Firms Exceeded Expectations, Survey of Managing Partners Says
- 5Blank Rome Adds Life Sciences Trio From Reed Smith
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250