Holland & Knight Turns to Paladin Platform for Pro Bono Matchmaking
Holland & Knight is the latest firm to deploy a platform created by Paladin to help connect lawyers with pro bono opportunities, and anticipate where their services will be needed next.
June 20, 2019 at 11:15 AM
3 minute read
Last week, Holland & Knight announced it would be deploying a platform developed by legal tech startup Paladin geared towards facilitating smoother and more proactive connections between people in need of pro bono legal services and the lawyers qualified to help them.
The law firm will also be using the platform as something of a weather vane, detecting shifts in the pro bono landscape sparked by politics or even a natural disaster, and training their talent accordingly.
The tool, therefore, essentially serves as a database of all the pro bono matters available, making it easier to detect patterns of need. Meg Hely Walsh, corporate responsibility partner at Holland & Knight, used the example of families being separated at the border between the U.S. and Mexico last spring.
“That came up quickly and intensely, and we were able to identify need and train people up to meet those needs,” she said.
Hence, Holland & Knight has been providing input to Paladin on the development of its cloud-based platform for nearly two years—and they aren't the only firm tossing its two cents into the mix. Last August, international law firm Dentons announced that it would be working Paladin on the platform as well.
Benjamin Weinberg, a partner at Dentons, told Legaltech News that he was looking for a solution that could create easier access to pro bono work for attorneys, which in broad strokes is exactly what the platform does. But what's wrong with email?
According to Hely Walsh, legal aid associations typically send out an email blast to multiple firms once a pro bono opportunity becomes available. By the time a law office gets that email into the hands of the right lawyer, the matter may have been picked up by a different firm or settled altogether.
The Paladin platform allows lawyers to approach pro bono work more proactively, starting with a questionnaire accessed via a computer or phone that gauges areas of interest and experience, which can help focus the list of pro bono options sourced from a live database. Instead of trying to squeeze pro bono opportunities into their schedules, attorneys can organically seek things out as time allows.
“That's a very practical way to deal with it because what happens is that someone might think that they are tied up for the next six months and all of the sudden a case settles and they've got some time,” Hely Walsh said.
Felicity Conrad, co-founder and CEO of Paladin, said one of the benefits of bringing onboard a firm like Holland & Knight—which has 28 offices located throughout the U.S.—is that it expands the scope of the startup's pro bono network as a whole, allowing them to continue pairing local legal aid organizations across the country with lawyers in their area.
“By bringing on Holland & Knight and all of the amazing legal service partners they work with, we're actually able to continue to build out our pro bono network in both existing geographies and new geographies,” Conrad said.
The startup's other aspirations for the platform are still in early stages, but Conrad said that they are in the process of reimagining ways that data points like hours or participation are tracked in addition to looking at new metrics like impact.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Recent Decisions Regarding the Telephone Consumer Protection Act
- 2The Tech Built by Law Firms in 2024
- 3Distressed M&A: Mass Torts, Bankruptcy and Furthering the Search for Consensus: Another Purdue Decision
- 4For Safer Traffic Stops, Replace Paper Documents With ‘Contactless’ Tech
- 5As Second Trump Administration Approaches, Businesses Brace for Sweeping Changes to Immigration Policy
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250