Holland & Knight Turns to Paladin Platform for Pro Bono Matchmaking
Holland & Knight is the latest firm to deploy a platform created by Paladin to help connect lawyers with pro bono opportunities, and anticipate where their services will be needed next.
June 20, 2019 at 11:15 AM
3 minute read
Last week, Holland & Knight announced it would be deploying a platform developed by legal tech startup Paladin geared towards facilitating smoother and more proactive connections between people in need of pro bono legal services and the lawyers qualified to help them.
The law firm will also be using the platform as something of a weather vane, detecting shifts in the pro bono landscape sparked by politics or even a natural disaster, and training their talent accordingly.
The tool, therefore, essentially serves as a database of all the pro bono matters available, making it easier to detect patterns of need. Meg Hely Walsh, corporate responsibility partner at Holland & Knight, used the example of families being separated at the border between the U.S. and Mexico last spring.
“That came up quickly and intensely, and we were able to identify need and train people up to meet those needs,” she said.
Hence, Holland & Knight has been providing input to Paladin on the development of its cloud-based platform for nearly two years—and they aren't the only firm tossing its two cents into the mix. Last August, international law firm Dentons announced that it would be working Paladin on the platform as well.
Benjamin Weinberg, a partner at Dentons, told Legaltech News that he was looking for a solution that could create easier access to pro bono work for attorneys, which in broad strokes is exactly what the platform does. But what's wrong with email?
According to Hely Walsh, legal aid associations typically send out an email blast to multiple firms once a pro bono opportunity becomes available. By the time a law office gets that email into the hands of the right lawyer, the matter may have been picked up by a different firm or settled altogether.
The Paladin platform allows lawyers to approach pro bono work more proactively, starting with a questionnaire accessed via a computer or phone that gauges areas of interest and experience, which can help focus the list of pro bono options sourced from a live database. Instead of trying to squeeze pro bono opportunities into their schedules, attorneys can organically seek things out as time allows.
“That's a very practical way to deal with it because what happens is that someone might think that they are tied up for the next six months and all of the sudden a case settles and they've got some time,” Hely Walsh said.
Felicity Conrad, co-founder and CEO of Paladin, said one of the benefits of bringing onboard a firm like Holland & Knight—which has 28 offices located throughout the U.S.—is that it expands the scope of the startup's pro bono network as a whole, allowing them to continue pairing local legal aid organizations across the country with lawyers in their area.
“By bringing on Holland & Knight and all of the amazing legal service partners they work with, we're actually able to continue to build out our pro bono network in both existing geographies and new geographies,” Conrad said.
The startup's other aspirations for the platform are still in early stages, but Conrad said that they are in the process of reimagining ways that data points like hours or participation are tracked in addition to looking at new metrics like impact.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Big Law Firms Sheppard Mullin, Morgan Lewis and Baker Botts Add Partners in Houston
- 2Lack of Jurisdiction Dooms Child Sex Abuse Claim Against Archdiocese of Philadelphia, says NJ Supreme Court
- 3DC Lawsuits Seek to Prevent Mass Firings and Public Naming of FBI Agents
- 4Growth of California Firms Exceeded Expectations, Survey of Managing Partners Says
- 5Blank Rome Adds Life Sciences Trio From Reed Smith
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250