LSAC Launches Access-to-Justice Legal Tech Competition
The Law School Admission Council's Justice Innovation Challenge pulls law school students into the access-to-justice realm of law and a glimpse into a nontraditional lawyer path.
June 25, 2019 at 11:15 AM
3 minute read
Known more for administering the LSAT, the Law School Admission Council is now accepting applications from U.S. law students with ideas on how to aid low-income people's legal needs for its first Justice Innovation Challenge.
While the solution ideas will vary, the ideas must focus on solving legal issues that are both challenging for low-income individuals to navigate and that saddle legal aid providers with considerable work. These include domestic violence, customer debt, evictions, business entity formation, foreclosures, access to government benefits and others.
“There are so many people not getting legal assistance and legal service organizations are overburdened and we have a complex legal system,” said LSAC presidential innovation fellow and Access to Justice Tech Fellows program director Miguel Willis. ”Folks find themselves not able to navigate the legal system when they have a legal issue.”
Applications for the challenge started in April and will close July 19. After whittling the applicants to 10 participants in late July, the teams will be partnered with nonprofit legal services organizations and mentors to refine their ideas and build their solutions.
Although participants aren't expected to have a ready-for-market product by the end of the competition, a judging panel, which is scheduled to include LSAC president Kellye Testy, Legal Services Corp. president James Sandman and others, will critique the solutions based on their inclusivity, innovation, community impact and realistic implementation.
By Aug. 21, a first-place winner will be awarded $15,000, with $10,000 and $5,000 being awarded to the second- and third-place winners respectively for seed funding.
The program is the brainchild of a similar competition, which Willis noted shows how such encouragement early in an idea's formation can lead to a tangible product. During his 2L year at the Seattle University School of Law, Willis participated in Seattle's Social Venture Partners Fast Pitch competition and won a $15,000 prize for an idea that became the Access to Justice Tech Fellows program, which officially launched in 2016.
With that success in mind, Willis said the challenge can help individuals seeking legal advice and budding law students. For instance, students can see firsthand how leveraging legal technology can lead to nontraditional employment paths.
But ultimately the challenge's main goal is to provide individuals an easier route to justice. “I really want to make this about impact,” Willis said. “We aren't looking for the next blockchain solution that solves every problem, but something community-centered that can help a law school clinic, [a] bar association or nonprofit organization.”
Universities have also looked to law students to help bridge the access-to-justice gap through technology. For example. Cornell Law School has offered a “Delivering Legal Services Through Technology” course while the Chicago-Kent University launched a masters of law degree program on legal innovation.
Associations integral to lawyer development have likewise stepped up. In the United Kingdom, for instance, the Solicitors Regulation Authority recently launched its first access-to-justice challenge.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250