These Six Boutiques Get the Most Startup Work: Report
Kruze Consulting surveyed its startup clients about the smaller law firms they turn to.
June 26, 2019 at 09:00 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
While a few Big Law firm brands continue to dominate the startup scene, some founders are turning to boutique firms for better rates and a smaller-firm atmosphere.
Kruze Consulting, which ranked top 5 U.S. startup law firms earlier this year, has conducted another study to identify the five top boutique law firms with the most startup clients.
The accounting firm analyzed over $40 million in professional services spending by its own U.S. startup clients, which number more than 180. They include companies in Seed to Series C funding stages.
Kruze found that the top two Silicon Valley firms, in terms of the number of startups they have served, are Atrium and Silicon Legal Strategy, tied for first.
In terms of spend, here's how the top boutiques made out, according to Kruze:
Rank | Firm | Average Startup Spend | Description |
1 | Silicon Legal Strategy | $47,000/yr | Silicon Legal Strategy, which started in 2007 with one lawyer and a part-time paralegal working, has grown to a team of 45 members, including five partners and 18 associates. The firm has offices in San Francisco, Los Angeles and Denver and providing advice to technology startups, entrepreneurs and seasoned investors. |
1 | Atrium | $23,000/yr | Atrium is a full-service corporate law firm founded by Twitch founder and Y Combinator partner, Justin Kan, along with former Orrick corporate partner Augie Rakow. The Silicon Valley-backed startup law firm amid to give the startups faster, more transparent and price-predictable by using modern technologies. It currently listed 33 attorneys and staffs on the website. |
2 | SPZ Legal | $18,000/yr | SPZ Legal, based in the Bay Area, provides outside general counsel services to startups and small businesses on matters including incorporation, financing, employment law, intellectual property, and business contracts. The firm has three attorneys and one administrative staff. |
3 | VLP Law Group | $7,000/yr | Founded in 2008, VLP is a business and transactional law firm that offers business and transactional services to companies, financial institutions and investors. The virtual law firm currently has 48 attorneys, according to its website. |
4 | Hopkins and Carley | $6,000/yr | Hopkins & Carley, which has been around since 1968, offers clients a broad range of services including business litigation, corporate, creditors' rights, employment, family wealth and tax planning, intellectual property and real estate issues. The Silicon Valley firm has about 92 attorneys and other staff in its offices in Palo Alto, San Francisco and San Jose |
5 | Fathom Law | $68,000/yr | Fathom Law, founded in 2013 in San Francisco, is a business and technology law firm offer flexible and alternative fees to clients including entrepreneurs, growth companies and investors. It currently has six attorneys focusing on practice areas including general corporate and securities matters, venture capital and private equity transactions, mergers and acquisitions, intellectual property matters and litigation. |
All of these firms are based in the Bay Area. To qualify as a “boutique,” each has fewer than 100 attorneys and is either completely focused on serving startup clients or has a strong tech practice, according to Kruze Consulting. The survey also excluded firms that are focused more on litigation, IP, immigration and real estate, as well as sole practitioners.
“The companies who use boutique firms tend to spend less money on their legal services, so they spend about maybe 60% of what they spend if they go with a big player,” said Healy Jones, vice president of marketing at Kruze Consulting.
The report found that boutique firms included in the survey bill about $33,000 per year for each startup, which is more than 40% lower than the $57,000 per year larger players earned, based on the agency's previous survey.
“The smart CEOs are always thinking about ways to save some money,” Jones added. Still, that's not the only consideration.
“I think the major reason why a startup founder chooses a law firm has a lot to do with the relationship with the partners they are going to work with. I wouldn't be surprised if it is the relationship that is the most important factor,” Jones said.
Jones explained that, while startup founders are attracted to boutique firms partially for the price, they tend to value more of the personal relationship with their legal counsel. But larger firms have more partners and therefore more potential relationships, so they still bring in a large number of clients.
The top two boutique firms, Silicon Legal Strategy and Atrium brought in an average of $47,000 per year and $23,000 per year, respectively. Andre Gharakhanian, a founding partner at Silicon Legal Strategy, said the time and effort his firm spends on managing the relationship with their startup clients has driven its success.
“Most of our clients are doing this for the first or second time. They don't have lawyers in-house,” Gharakhanian said. “We found that just as important, if not more important, than the technical legal guidance that we bring them, really is good, old-fashioned customer service.”
The survey also noted that legal spend can vary greatly among startups, depending on fundraising, litigation, complex employment law or IP protection. Some startups in the study spent over $100,000 in legal costs, while other companies when not fundraising, manage to spend almost nothing on legal costs in a given year. It found over half of the companies in the sample spent less than $40,000 a year.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 2Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 3Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
- 4Husch Blackwell, Foley Among Law Firms Opening Southeast Offices This Year
- 5In Lawsuit, Ex-Google Employee Says Company’s Layoffs Targeted Parents and Others on Leave
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250