Forget Legal Fees, Other Data Breach Costs Can Be Company Ending
Legal fees are to be expected when a company's data is breached. But are companies prepared for the storm of bad press, ballooning IT expenses and steep notification costs? One company says it wasn't.
June 28, 2019 at 10:00 AM
4 minute read
When it comes to data breaches, the sticker shock isn't just from an outside counsel's invoice.
The bankruptcy filing of Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau Inc., which collects medical bills under the name American Medical Collection Agency (AMCA), offers a cautionary example of the costs associated with a data breach. From reputational harms to notification spending and IT expenses, the non-litigation costs can be considerable.
In a June 17 filing in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, the company wrote it was left in financial distress after it announced its servers were hacked. Because of the security incident, AMCA exposed nearly 20 million Quest Diagnostic and LabCorp customers' data, including their birth dates, addresses, phone numbers and medical bill balances.
According to the bankruptcy filing, almost immediately after AMCA announced the breach, it was fired by LabCorp, and its financial losses continued to mount. Along with hiring IT personnel and consultants for $400,000, AMCA spent $3.8 million to mail over seven million individual notices in accordance to various states' data breach notification requirements. As a result of ballooning spending and losing its largest client, the company reduced its workforce and said it “no longer is optimistic that it will be able to rehabilitate its business.”
The news of AMCA's hefty costs stemming from a data breach highlights the consequences breaches can pose, said Connell Foley cybersecurity and data privacy chair Karen Painter Randall.
“The costs are outrageous [even] if you can afford it, but it appears in this case [AMCA] couldn't,” Randall said, adding, “It could be very complex and costly once you engage in the notification process.”
She noted that every state has its own data breach notification law, placing a company that collects personal data from residents of various states under the scope of multiple requirements.
Some data breach notifications require mailed notice of the breach, making companies responsible for printing and paying to ship letters. “It adds up if you have millions of people,” said Davis Polk & Wardwell partner Avi Gesser.
Outside of the financial penalties doled out by law enforcement and regulators, a data breach can also sour public perception of a company and negatively impact its profits.
“'If you have the type of business—a cyber or law firm where people rely on you to keep their secrets—if you have experienced a data breach you may have a loss of confidence,” Gesser said. The bad press may also hurt in recruiting talent or keeping clients, he added.
Likewise, ransomware attacks that lock a company out of its own computer system can disrupt a business's operations and revenue. “One of the reasons why people are getting cyberinsurance is to cover these types of costs,” Gesser said.
Randall agreed and said a cyber liability policy could have covered a data breach like AMCA's.
“It would be interesting to know if the entity had a cyber liability insurance,” she said. “That would have covered a lot. My thought is they may not have had a cyber liability policy in place.”
According to the bankruptcy declaration, Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau's CEO Russell Fuchs personally loaned his company $2.5 million to cover mailing seven million breach notifications, a cost that could have been covered by a cyberinsurance plan, Randall noted.
“That gives you an example of what an incident response could cost. That's just the first-party loss, that doesn't include litigation costs and reputational costs,” she said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250