Did Someone Die? Then Don't Call Me
We're better off having additional forms of communication, but what do you do when these platforms simply seem to increase the potential for being interrupted? Here's how to combat the most common sources of interruptions.
July 01, 2019 at 07:00 AM
6 minute read
How many times has someone burst into your office with news that couldn't wait, only to find it most definitely could have waited? Interruptions can wreak havoc in any workplace, forcing employees to momentarily disregard their own projects and schedules in order to accommodate others'.
Interruptions Are Stealing Your Life
Everyone knows what it feels like to be interrupted. It can be irritating, sometimes frustrating, and always distracting. But what about costly? Interruptions, even those that seem like they're no big deal, are a big deal. Productivity takes a real hit. According to Gloria Mark, Professor in the Department of Informatics at the University of California, it takes an average of 23 minutes and 15 seconds to get back on task following an interruption. And that's just one interruption.
Studies from Portland State University claim that interruptions increase stress, anxiety and physical discomfort, causing people to be more exhausted at the end of the day.
In my own experience working at a law firm, I saw firsthand how constant interruptions made it difficult to keep track of deadlines. A typical lawyer can have hundreds of cases, and each case has a long list of deadlines. You miss a deadline, and you may very well have lost more than the case. Law firms have been ruined that way.
Interruptions Take Many Forms, but the Result's the Same
In today's world of digital communication, it's no longer just a matter of people popping into your office or calling you on the phone. Email, text messages, voice mail, apps such as Slack and Google Hangouts, Facebook—the list grows every day. (Keeping track of all those platforms is in itself a challenge, but we'll leave that for another day.)
Certainly, we're better off having these additional forms of communication, but what do you do when these platforms—including the traditional phone and office visit—simply seem to increase the potential for being interrupted? Here are some of the most common sources of interruptions:
Text Messages
Text messages and instant messages can be a convenient way to communicate, but they can lead to problems. For instance, do you answer it immediately? Save it for later? Either way, there's an interruption in your workflow. Studies show that switching from a task to instant message or text message and then back again costs an average of at least 20 minutes of productivity. And if you wait to respond, you also run the risk of the message becoming forgotten or lost.
Dealing with interruptions from texts:
- Switch off notifications.
- Route texts through a personal assistant.
- Set aside specific times during the day to check messages.
What you can do:
- Ask yourself, do I really need to send this?
- Be brief and be clear.
- If you don't need a response, don't include a leading question or comment that would prompt one.
Email can be a distraction on a number of levels. Urgent messages are often lost among less urgent or trivial messages. Then there's the problem of how often you check your email. Research suggests that by choosing to deal with email first thing in the morning, workers may even be ruining their ability to be productive later in the day. Some experts have suggested that the habit of checking email can be a self-initiated distraction when coping with feelings of discomfort in the workplace.
Email is also a potential source of “decision fatigue”—a state in which a person's ability to prioritize, or even accomplish basic tasks, is hampered by the mental exhaustion associated with making too many decisions in a day.
Dealing with interruptions from email:
- Schedule time throughout the day to check your email.
- Use tags and routing rules to sort and prioritize your email.
- Respond to your most important items first.
What you can do:
- (Again) Ask yourself, do I really need to send this?
- Stay on message.
- Make it easy to respond.
Phone Calls
When you need an answer right away or if the nature of the call precludes any other form of communication, the phone is still the best option. However, phone calls are particularly disruptive. And while they are useful for time-sensitive information, they actually take up more time than texts or emails because you have to write down any relevant information that you need to keep—and then make sure it doesn't get lost.
Dealing with interruptions from phone calls:
- Use common tools like phone number blocking to avoid unknown callers.
- Route calls through an assistant or phone management software.
- Schedule time to review your voicemail.
What you can do:
- Ask yourself, would a less obtrusive communication option work better?
- Be ready to leave a clear, direct voice message.
- Get what you need so you don't have to call twice!
Impromptu Meetings
When a situation calls for multiple people to communicate together and you can't schedule a regular meeting, an impromptu meeting is your best bet. But, by its very nature, this is the most disruptive, because it involves more people and it rarely has a set timeframe.
Dealing with interruptions from impromptu meetings:
- Block out time as unavailable.
- Record the meeting.
- Agree on a time to end the meeting.
What you can do:
- Ask yourself, is a meeting necessary?
- Include only key players.
- Be ruthless in staying on topic.
Reclaim Your Life, One Less Interruption at a Time
We've talked about specific sources of interruptions and how you can stay productive, but the most important thing you can do to minimize interruptions in your workplace is to build a culture of “anti-interruption,” or interruption avoidance. It starts when everyone in the office understands how damaging interruptions can be and when they are willing to commit to eliminating as many interruptions as possible.
Yes, some interruptions are necessary, but once you've committed to avoiding interruptions, you'll find that a lot of things that you once thought were critically time-sensitive are actually things that can wait. But to create this culture means a shift in perspective and willingness to adopt new ideas and new tools as you move to a new technological ecosystem. It isn't easy, but you'll surely find the boost in productivity is worth it.
Ryan M. Anderson is the Founder and CEO of Filevine, which is the top-rated case management system for attorneys according to the independent review site Capterra. From its launch in 2015, Filevine has focused on first-to-market innovation and award-winning design.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Pennsylvania Law Schools Are Seeing Double-Digit Boosts in 2025 Applications
- 2Meta’s New Content Guidelines May Result in Increased Defamation Lawsuits Among Users
- 3State Court Rejects Uber's Attempt to Move IP Suit to Latin America
- 4Florida Supreme Court Disciplined 17 Attorneys
- 5Sex Work at Wyndham? Judge Allows 10th Human-Trafficking Suit
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250