Philadelphia Attorneys Adjusting to the 'Old Normal' in 6 Weeks Without E-Filing
Philadelphia's court system website has been shut down since the afternoon of May 21. The move after the First Judicial District experienced a “virus intrusion on a limited number of computers.”
July 01, 2019 at 02:00 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Legal Intelligencer
Six weeks after the First Judicial District shut down its digital systems after being hacked, its website is back online and internal electronic work stations have been set up so court staff can enter filings. But the publicly accessible electronic docket and filing systems, the systems most heavily relied on by the city's legal industry, remain inaccessible.
While some attorneys have expressed frustration about the length of time the system has been down and the lack of information about the digital intrusion that lead to the shutdown, lawyers said few significant problems have arisen in recent weeks and they have largely adapted to a new normal.
“There are instances in which it's been a headache for certain types of practices, but most have adjusted to the new normal, or more like the old normal,” Albert Bixler, member-in-charge for Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott's Philadelphia office, said, referring to the fact that, with the electronic filing system down, all papers need to be filed in person at the courthouse.
Philadelphia's court system website has been shut down since the afternoon of May 21. According to a city spokesman, the move was done to “safeguard” the systems after the First Judicial District experienced a “virus intrusion on a limited number of computers.” The shutdown left the FJD's website, online civil docket search and e-filing system for civil and criminal cases inaccessible.
The court has offered little information about the intrusion so far, citing security concerns. Although court administrator Joseph Evers initially told The Philadelphia Inquirer on June 21 that the hack appeared to have originated from Russia, that claim was strongly and quickly walked back by court and city officials, including Mark Wheeler, chief information officer for the Kenney administration, who told The Inquirer on June 22 the investigation was still ongoing and the source was “not Russian.”
Regardless of the origin, court officials maintain that no court data was breached in the intrusion.
Over the past few weeks, the court's digital system has begun to show signs of life.
In mid-June, the court announced the Municipal Court Claims system was operational, and on Wednesday, the court announced its website was back up, although accessible only on Microsoft Edge, Safari and Firefox browsers.
For attorneys, those updates mean little, since the e-filing system and docket searches are still offline. In the meantime, law firms have adapted by having couriers file documents with the court in person and improvising ways to manually print out copies of dockets.
Rachel Gallegos, a senior staff attorney at Community Legal Service's homeownership and consumer rights unit, said the municipal court system getting back online was a big help, but simply determining the state of a new client's case, such as whether and when a lawsuit has been filed, can be difficult. Instead of a quick docket search, attorneys are much more reliant on court personnel and opposing counsel, who, Gallegos said, have by and large been very helpful.
Gallegos said frustration is ”a useless emotion” when you have clients potentially facing imminent sheriff sales.
“Six weeks in, you can only be angry so much,” she said. “We have to work with it, and work around it to the best of our ability.”
As of late June, civil attorneys said they had not heard of too many problems.
Raynes Lawn and Hehmeyer attorney Timothy Lawn, who is president of the Philadelphia Trial Lawyers Association, said he emailed the group's members soon after the initial shutdown to let them know they should come to him with any problems, but has only received one complaint.
“I think people are trying to make do,” he said. “Everyone's trying to cooperate and get along.”
Criminal defense attorney A. Charles Peruto said he was surprised the court system had been penetrable and that it has taken so long to recover. However, he also said there have been few problems at the Criminal Justice Center.
“Filing by hand brought back memories,” he said.
Discovery documents, he said, are being passed between parties in packages, the way discovery used to be done before the e-filing system, but doing things manually has not slowed down trials, he said.
In City Hall, where the civil cases are handled, things appeared to be running smoothly as well. Although some reported lines of up to an hour in the immediate aftermath of the shutdown, there were no lines at the filing office on Thursday, and two couriers said the system was running smoothly.
“Even when it does get crowded, they got it under control,” courier Isaac Finkelstein said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Burns White Names Conshohocken Litigator as New CEO
- 2Mattel Sued Over 'Wicked' Dolls With Pornographic Website
- 3Brown Rudnick’s Brand and Reputation Group Unfazed After Loss of 6 Prominent Partners and Their Big-Name Clients
- 4Fulton Judge Weighs Whether to Order Fani Willis to Comply With Lawmakers' Subpoenas Over Trump Case
- 5Lawyers Drowning in Cases Are Embracing AI Fastest—and Say It's Yielding Better Outcomes for Clients
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.