Vendors, Not Counsel, Tapped for Increasingly Critical Blockchain Audits
While lawyers said blockchain audits aren't performed by attorneys, the audits remain a valuable measure to protect clients and verify accuracy.
July 01, 2019 at 11:00 AM
3 minute read
The risks and potential significant losses tied to blockchains can be lost in the hype of large companies deploying smart contracts, cryptocurrencies and other blockchain-powered programs. However, as companies leverage blockchain for valuable work, more are auditing those platforms to detect any coding errors that could lead to losses, lawyers contacted by Legaltech News said.
But they aren't turning to their lawyers for that service. Instead, they look to third-party technology vendors.
Fenwick & West payment systems chair Dan Friedberg said he hasn't seen many circumstances for lawyers to initiate an audit of a client's blockchain. He said companies commonly enlist a third-party tech vendor to audit a new smart contract of significant value to detect any potential errors that could be exploited.
As smart contracts become a more crucial aspect of a business's bottom line, Friedberg foresees blockchain audits possibly being required.
He added that over time, “if smart contracts are significant to a company's financial position, I think we will start to see CPAs [certified public accountants] more often require audits of smart contracts for them to render their opinions in financial audits.”
Indeed, as market demand increases for smart contracts, more technology companies are releasing auditing tools to detect smart contracts' security risks. Last November, Legaltech News covered the release of Mythril, NRI Secure Technologies' software that scans smart contracts hosted on Ethereum for security risks. NRI security engineer Teruhiro Tagomori said at the time that companies need to understand the security differences between blockchain and traditional software.
“They need to know those [differences] well and prepare some mechanism like circuit breakers based on the premise that some vulnerabilities will be found after deploying smart contracts on public blockchain,” Tagomori said.
Likewise, as more companies leverage cryptocurrencies, Big Four accounting firm PricewaterhouseCoopers released its cryptocurrency auditing add-on to its data analysis suite dubbed Halo.
In a June 20 press release, PwC described the add-on as proving “private key and public address pairing” needed to established cryptocurrency ownership and examines the blockchain to validate its transactions and balances.
While the mystique of blockchain being an impenetrable technology still exists for some, companies are realizing their blockchain-backed system can be hijacked and the audits provide some assurance that it is coded properly.
“It's often what the companies are concerned about it. The smart thing is for companies to avoid those vulnerabilities,” Friedberg said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250