Vendors, Not Counsel, Tapped for Increasingly Critical Blockchain Audits
While lawyers said blockchain audits aren't performed by attorneys, the audits remain a valuable measure to protect clients and verify accuracy.
July 01, 2019 at 11:00 AM
3 minute read
The risks and potential significant losses tied to blockchains can be lost in the hype of large companies deploying smart contracts, cryptocurrencies and other blockchain-powered programs. However, as companies leverage blockchain for valuable work, more are auditing those platforms to detect any coding errors that could lead to losses, lawyers contacted by Legaltech News said.
But they aren't turning to their lawyers for that service. Instead, they look to third-party technology vendors.
Fenwick & West payment systems chair Dan Friedberg said he hasn't seen many circumstances for lawyers to initiate an audit of a client's blockchain. He said companies commonly enlist a third-party tech vendor to audit a new smart contract of significant value to detect any potential errors that could be exploited.
As smart contracts become a more crucial aspect of a business's bottom line, Friedberg foresees blockchain audits possibly being required.
He added that over time, “if smart contracts are significant to a company's financial position, I think we will start to see CPAs [certified public accountants] more often require audits of smart contracts for them to render their opinions in financial audits.”
Indeed, as market demand increases for smart contracts, more technology companies are releasing auditing tools to detect smart contracts' security risks. Last November, Legaltech News covered the release of Mythril, NRI Secure Technologies' software that scans smart contracts hosted on Ethereum for security risks. NRI security engineer Teruhiro Tagomori said at the time that companies need to understand the security differences between blockchain and traditional software.
“They need to know those [differences] well and prepare some mechanism like circuit breakers based on the premise that some vulnerabilities will be found after deploying smart contracts on public blockchain,” Tagomori said.
Likewise, as more companies leverage cryptocurrencies, Big Four accounting firm PricewaterhouseCoopers released its cryptocurrency auditing add-on to its data analysis suite dubbed Halo.
In a June 20 press release, PwC described the add-on as proving “private key and public address pairing” needed to established cryptocurrency ownership and examines the blockchain to validate its transactions and balances.
While the mystique of blockchain being an impenetrable technology still exists for some, companies are realizing their blockchain-backed system can be hijacked and the audits provide some assurance that it is coded properly.
“It's often what the companies are concerned about it. The smart thing is for companies to avoid those vulnerabilities,” Friedberg said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250