The Larger the Legal Department, the More Likely It's Using Tech
While some “fundamental” legal tech finds a home in most legal departments, smaller staffed legal departments aren't leveraging technology at the rate of their larger counterparts, according to a new report from the ACC.
July 02, 2019 at 11:30 AM
3 minute read
A corporate legal department's head count correlates to its tech adoption rate, according to a new report by the Association of Corporate Counsel.
Last week the ACC released its 2019 “Global Legal Department Benchmarking Report,” which compared corporate legal departments' staffing, outside counsel spending and technology usage. The report, which was done in partnership with Major, Lindsey & Africa and surveyed 508 legal departments from 30 countries, found that less than half of respondents are using legal technology.
But ACC associate vice president of legal management services Catherine Moynihan noted that the report's “surprisingly low adoption rate of technology across legal departments, when we look deeper into the data, is a function of most legal departments being quite small [between] one to four lawyers.” She added, “There is actually very high adoptions of all these types of technologies in the larger companies and legal departments.”
Specifically, the report found that e-signature (44%), contract management (41%) and document management (38%) were the top three tools used by corporate legal departments. Moynihan said she thinks those technologies will remain a “fundamental” tool across all legal departments because they are critical to their larger priority of knowledge management and efficiency.
Under closer examination, though, the adoption rates of such technology correlate with a larger staff.
While overall 44% of respondents said they use e-signatures, for instance, that number drops to 38% for a legal department staff with one to nine people. E-signature technology adoption rate grows to nearly 52% for a 10- to 24-person legal staff, drops to 45% for departments of 25 to 99 people and leaps to 72% for legal departments staffing 100-plus, according to an ACC document provided to Legaltech News.
Overall, as the department size grew, the adoption rate for all technology increased. Moynihan noted that adoption rate discrepancies stem from larger corporate legal departments staffing more people and a company's higher litigation rate demanding more efficiency and automation.
Outside of integration tools, while the overall adoption rate for e-discovery analytics and review was 9%, over half (53%) of law departments with 100-plus staffers said they were using e-discovery analytics and review. Likewise, while nearly 12% of all legal departments said they used e-discovery tools for collections and processing, the number rose to 65% of large legal departments.
Moynihan explained that e-discovery tools were adopted less often by smaller legal departments because, like the other low-adopted technologies in the survey, they were more likely to use outside counsel or vendors for those matters.
“It's understandable if it's a lower priority because how e-discovery is managed. It is most often outsourced. That said, once again it's really true across the board that the larger the company, the larger the legal department and the more likely they will have that in-house,” Moynihan said.
The report also found that Microsoft was the most-used vendor for contract, document and records management; workflow tools; collaboration/knowledge management; analytics; and integration tools. Microsoft is common as a vendor for legal departments because it's “ubiquitous enterprise wide,” Moynihan said. “Everyone has SharePoint because it's part of your suite in Microsoft,” she added.
Still, Microsoft wasn't the only vendor highlighted multiple times, Thomson Reuters was listed as the most common vendor for matter management and e-billing, while Relativity was also cited twice for e-discovery collections and analytics.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250