Clause Closes $5.5 Million Funding Round Amidst Smart Contract 'Moment'
Clause intends to use the funding to grow its engineering department and capitalize on some of the opportunities that come with combining contract review and blockchain technology together.
July 03, 2019 at 10:00 AM
3 minute read
Last week, smart contract technology provider Clause announced the conclusion of a $5.5 million Series A round of venture capital financing led by crypto firm Galaxy Digital with strategic investment from DocuSign.
Peter Hunn, founder of Clause, said the funding will be used to grow the company's engineering department and capitalize on some of the opportunities that have opened up within the contract space now that law firms and other large enterprises have begun to embrace the data-mining possibilities therein.
“The opportunity that we see is that you can begin to really integrate those contracts with the systems that provide data to it and need data from it. … It's really important to begin to integrate these enterprise systems together. The contract is the missing link,” Hunn said.
When it comes to trying to close that link, business appears to be good, both for Clause and the smart contract sphere in general. Last September, legal services provider LegalZoom announced a deal with the company that allows its users to edit, sign or augment contracts using the Clause platform.
The platform can be used on top of any of the leading blockchain networks to provide for an automatic contract execution. For example, a signature applied to a contract might trigger a preprogramed action such as a payment made to a specific place, at a certain time. Clause can also connect contracts to external data sources like IoT platforms or web services to ensure that other conditions of an agreement are automatically executed as outlined.
The market for those kinds of services may be growing along with the volume of contracts in the market. In a statement accompanying the Series A round announcement, Greg Wasserman, co-head of investing at Galaxy Digital, indicated that smart contracts are addressing a significant pain point that has emerged within organizations.
“Major enterprises sign millions of documents per year across many different business units. It's extremely difficult for companies to monitor and manage all of the terms within those documents,” Wasserman said.
Such a clearly defined need could translate into a prime target for investors, especially if audience recognition of that need continues to grow. Per Hunn, while the term “smart contract” isn't a household phrase yet, the idea is “having its moment.”
He attributed that sentiment to a broader interest in the underlying blockchain and distributed ledger technology. There's also the notion that with the onset of data-mining, smart contracts are approaching the next organic evolution towards full maturity. “The promise of smart contracts is really coming into fruition and a lot of investors are really excited about that,” Hunn said.
So what does all of that mean for Clause moving forward? Spurred by capital from the Series A round, a newly-expanded engineering team will be directed towards both improving and building upon the platform's features. In a nutshell, this means broadening the number of business functions within an organization that can be connected to a smart contract and its underlying blockchain network.
“We want to make it easier for people to create smart legal contracts. We want to enable you to integrate with pretty much every enterprise system that's available, be that [contract lifecycle management] systems, payment processes, blockchain, you name it,” Hunn said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1‘Not a Kindergarten Teacher’: Judge Blasts Keller Postman, Jenner & Block in Mass Arb Dispute
- 2A&O Shearman, Hogan Lovells and the Stories That Shaped Africa This Year
- 3Borden Ladner Gervais Cyber Expert Warns of AI-Boosted Ransomware Attacks
- 4Phila. Judge Upholds $68.5M Verdict Over Construction Worker's Death
- 5Biden Vetoes Bill to Create More Federal Judgeships
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250