Exigent Kicks Off New Evergreen Fund for Legal Tech
In a bid to prevent startups from becoming "roadkill" and provide better understanding of client needs, alternative legal service provider Exigent has launched a legal tech fund.
July 03, 2019 at 07:30 AM
3 minute read
Today, alternative legal service provider Exigent launched Bright Minds Capital Partners, an evergreen fund for legal tech companies, with the aim of connecting startups with funding, industry expertise and clients.
To be sure, venture capitalists and law firms are already investing in legal tech companies, but Exigent co-founder and CEO David Holme said startups have been mostly “ill served” by those entities.
He added that law firms' risk aversion and the possibility of a legal tech startup being teamed up with a venture capitalist with no background in legal tech does a disservice to those nascent companies looking for funding.
Holme noted that while legal tech investments are up, tech adoption by lawyers is low. Key to making products that are profitable is understanding what clients need, he said. “If you sat in the ecosystem and listened to venture capitalists and not customers, you will be part of the roadkill.”
Given its 15 years providing legal tech solutions, ranging from outside counsel spend analytics software to manual contract review, Holme argued that Exigent provides the experience, client access and capital essential for a growing legal tech company.
Additionally, Holme noted that Bright Minds Capital Partners' evergreen funding structure places less pressure on startups to quickly materialize return on investments.
Evergreen funding gradually provides funding to a company on a scheduled basis or by request of the investment team. As a cornerstone investor, Exigent and other companies agree to subscribe for a certain amount of shares in the startup. Holme declined to detail who the other investors are, but said they would represent various industries.
Holme explained that Bright Minds Capital Partners was launched because of the uptick in legal tech investments and what he saw as the blurring line between legal and finance tech. While tech platforms that receive funding from Bright Minds Capital Partners can be rooted in legal technology, Holme said their functionality should also be applicable to other industries.
“Clients experiencing the digitization of information means the barrier between legal tech and finance tech is fracturing because its data [is] common. The silo between companies is becoming less pronounced. We want to have technology that is more broader than legal, that's where I think the demand is growing.”
Holme also noted that Bright Minds Capital Partners will pitch startups' software to Exigent clients and their investor subscribers for co-investment opportunities and to test the product and elicit feedback.
Exigent's launch into the legal tech funding arena comes after multiple legal tech investments were made in June, including alternative legal service provider Elevate raising $25 million, practice management software platform Litify securing $10 million and Onna announcing an $11 million investment.
What's more, as Exigent expands from offering alternative legal services into tech investments, other players are stepping into its market. For instance, Eversheds Sutherland last week became the latest international law firm to create an alternative legal service provider, which it hopes will bring in $127 million in annual revenue.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Administrative Court Finds Prevailing Wage Law Applies to Workers Who Cleaned NYC Subways During Pandemic
- 2Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 3Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
- 4'Almost an Arms Race': California Law Firms Scooped Up Lateral Talent by the Handful in 2024
- 5Pittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250