Exigent Kicks Off New Evergreen Fund for Legal Tech
In a bid to prevent startups from becoming "roadkill" and provide better understanding of client needs, alternative legal service provider Exigent has launched a legal tech fund.
July 03, 2019 at 07:30 AM
3 minute read
Today, alternative legal service provider Exigent launched Bright Minds Capital Partners, an evergreen fund for legal tech companies, with the aim of connecting startups with funding, industry expertise and clients.
To be sure, venture capitalists and law firms are already investing in legal tech companies, but Exigent co-founder and CEO David Holme said startups have been mostly “ill served” by those entities.
He added that law firms' risk aversion and the possibility of a legal tech startup being teamed up with a venture capitalist with no background in legal tech does a disservice to those nascent companies looking for funding.
Holme noted that while legal tech investments are up, tech adoption by lawyers is low. Key to making products that are profitable is understanding what clients need, he said. “If you sat in the ecosystem and listened to venture capitalists and not customers, you will be part of the roadkill.”
Given its 15 years providing legal tech solutions, ranging from outside counsel spend analytics software to manual contract review, Holme argued that Exigent provides the experience, client access and capital essential for a growing legal tech company.
Additionally, Holme noted that Bright Minds Capital Partners' evergreen funding structure places less pressure on startups to quickly materialize return on investments.
Evergreen funding gradually provides funding to a company on a scheduled basis or by request of the investment team. As a cornerstone investor, Exigent and other companies agree to subscribe for a certain amount of shares in the startup. Holme declined to detail who the other investors are, but said they would represent various industries.
Holme explained that Bright Minds Capital Partners was launched because of the uptick in legal tech investments and what he saw as the blurring line between legal and finance tech. While tech platforms that receive funding from Bright Minds Capital Partners can be rooted in legal technology, Holme said their functionality should also be applicable to other industries.
“Clients experiencing the digitization of information means the barrier between legal tech and finance tech is fracturing because its data [is] common. The silo between companies is becoming less pronounced. We want to have technology that is more broader than legal, that's where I think the demand is growing.”
Holme also noted that Bright Minds Capital Partners will pitch startups' software to Exigent clients and their investor subscribers for co-investment opportunities and to test the product and elicit feedback.
Exigent's launch into the legal tech funding arena comes after multiple legal tech investments were made in June, including alternative legal service provider Elevate raising $25 million, practice management software platform Litify securing $10 million and Onna announcing an $11 million investment.
What's more, as Exigent expands from offering alternative legal services into tech investments, other players are stepping into its market. For instance, Eversheds Sutherland last week became the latest international law firm to create an alternative legal service provider, which it hopes will bring in $127 million in annual revenue.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250