A Small Firm Trying to Gain New Clients? Try Legal Tech
Legal tech is creating a new frontier of services for independent lawyers that can truly transform their business into a successful practice.
July 09, 2019 at 07:00 AM
3 minute read
Throughout the legal profession, the pressure to win new clients and increase visibility in the marketplace has skyrocketed in the past decade. With nearly 15% more lawyers in the country than ten years ago, this pressure is especially felt by independent law firms who struggle to get known, gain clients and be financially viable while concurrently building a reputation in their community that drives new business.
In a saturated legal market, getting new clients is incredibly difficult to do. Traditional advertising is dead. Standing out on price alone will almost always be a race to the bottom.
But there's another way: legal tech. The 21st century has seen the rise of a connected world and streamlined everyday services—think Facebook, Uber and Amazon—legal tech too is creating a new frontier of services for independent lawyers that can truly transform their business into a successful practice.
Facebook connected the world with an easy-to-use platform, and Uber took the pain out of hailing a car, new services are connecting consumers directly with attorneys right on their mobile phones—no more wasted time playing phone tag.
In an industry that moves at glacial speeds, attitudes toward technology are starting to improve. Independent attorneys and small law firms are realizing they can fix their business development issues through low-cost, highly effective technology that will increase business and build a strong digital reputation.
According to Thomson Reuters' 2017 State of U.S. Small Law Firms study, 17% of lawyers surveyed thought of DIY (do-it-yourself) legal websites as competition, up from 11% in 2016. This number was even higher for solo attorneys, 28% of which identified DIY providers as competitors.
The truth is, DIY sites are competition for one-offs like wills and contracts. However, there will always be a strong market for quality, trustworthy legal advisory.
According to the same report, 71% of respondents who indicate they have a challenge acquiring new business say they are not addressing it.
Furthermore, Brian Leiter's Law School Reports show that extrapolated IRS data indicate that solo practitioners make an average of $64,422, which doesn't include those who didn't make a profit.
There are many legal tech tools dealing with the actual nature of legal work—from using artificial intelligence and automation tools to track documents and complete tasks—there are now tools to help solo practitioners and smaller-staffed firms with business development and brand exposure as well.
Solo attorneys and small practices can greatly benefit from today's legal tech tools. They should examine their current marketing strategies, discontinue often costly marketing tactics that are not yielding results, and divert that investment toward legal tech—often saving substantially in the process.
The same way people like to scroll through options on food delivery sites like Seamless, dating apps like Tinder and product sites like Amazon, they too will want to connect with attorneys in a digital manner.
Gone are the days of cold calling, waiting for referrals and direct response advertising. Today's solo practitioners and small law firms should embrace the new technologies that consumers are using to find new attorneys—and be among the first to increase clients, exposure and revenue.
Felix Shipkevich is the CEO of Hotspot Law, a platform connecting consumers to attorneys. He has also been a New York City-based attorney for over 16 years.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250