Reputation, Business Damage Possibilities Keep Many Companies Mum Over Cybercrimes
Forget regulators and civil litigation, what companies likely fear most from a cyber incident is the possibility of losing business from concerned consumers.
July 09, 2019 at 11:30 AM
3 minute read
Concerned about reputational damage and lost business, many companies are underreporting cybercrimes.
Half of cybersecurity respondents to ISACA’s “State of Cybersecurity 2019,” a survey of 1,500 cybersecurity professionals from each continent, said they believe most enterprises underreport cyber incidents they are required to disclose. What’s more, a quarter believed enterprises underreport incidents they’re not legally required to make public as well.
To Womble Bond Dickinson privacy and cybersecurity team co-chair and partner Theodore Claypoole, the statistics don’t represent a new trend. He said businesses are resistant to report cybercrimes because it’s publicizing mistakes, embarrassments and possible incompetence.
“Even if the attack is brilliant and no one could have stopped it, those details are lost on the general public and especially regulators, who tend to blame the victim in these cases for not protecting consumer or employee data,” Claypoole wrote in an email.
Although not all cyber incidents lead to regulatory penalties, the negative media attention may be costly in the long run.
“In this day, where a company shows competence dealing with a successful attack, the company can minimize reputational damage and come back strong. But it is hard to believe that negative news will not hurt the company in a significant way,” Claypoole noted.
To be sure, Target faced a nearly 50% drop in profits after its massive 2013 data breach, while American Medical Collection Agency lost LabCorp as a client after its servers were hacked.
Frost Brown Todd partner Victoria Beckman also noted that companies may not report a cyber incident if they are acquired by another organization. She said some companies may believe they don’t have to reveal that information to their acquirer. However, a Forescout Technologies Inc. survey found more mergers and acquisition deals are prying into a company’s cybersecurity history.
Companies may also worry about the expenses associated with reporting a cyber incident, including IT upgrades, counsel fees and providing credit monitoring and notices to those breached, Beckman said. Indeed, American Medical Collection Agency spent $3.8 million for notifying just seven million of the 20 million customers whose data was breached, according to a bankruptcy notice it filed last month.
Nonetheless, Beckman said regulatory requirements make reporting a cyber incident the best policy, in light of varying statutes’ definition of a breach and documentation and notification requirements.
“I would never recommend not to report an incident,” Beckman said. ”It would expose the organization to serious legal and economic consequences. If after a risk assessment, the organization concludes there was no reportable breach but only a minor incident, that thought process must also be documented.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Chief Judge Joins Panel Exploring Causes for Public's Eroding Faith in NY Legal System
- 2Pogo Stick Maker Wants Financing Company to Pay $20M After Bailing Out Client
- 3Goldman Sachs Secures Dismissal of Celebrity Manager's Lawsuit Over Failed Deal
- 4Trump Moves to Withdraw Applications to Halt Now-Completed Sentencing
- 5Trump's RTO Mandate May Have Some Gov't Lawyers Polishing Their Resumes
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250