Legal Tech Bets on Compliance, Risk Management to Weather Next Recession
While decreasing corporate legal spend on technology is a concern during the next recession, legal tech vendors say compliance and risk management tools are not likely to be a casualty of any future cuts.
July 16, 2019 at 11:00 AM
3 minute read
While legal tech companies may not see a downturn in legal spend or the economy on the horizon, some economists are warning about an approaching recession.
But despite many not even existing when the Great Recession rocked the global economy in 2008, legal tech companies are confident they can weather any coming storm. Specifically, they note that legal tech solutions that contribute to the broader corporate compliance and risk management efforts will still be in demand during the next recession.
“When the downturn comes, it very quickly weeds out those new organizations that have valuable return on investment solutions and those that do not,” said Dan Carmel, chief marketing officer at AI and document management company iManage.
Carmel noted that while no service is immune from tighter budgets, compliance, information governance and risk management are regulatory requirements that companies must maintain despite a recession.
“Government requirements in our industry are only increasing. I think organizations through tough times segregate their expenses between the must haves and would really like to have,” he said.
Likewise, e-discovery and artificial intelligence platform Relativity noted that its expansion into compliance monitoring makes the company “at least somewhat impervious to recessions,” wrote David Horrigan, discovery counsel and legal education director at Relativity, in an email. “E-discovery may happen when you get sued, but compliance is every day,” he added.
Yet David Holme, co-founder and CEO of legal service provider Exigent, which recently launched a new legal tech fund, cautioned that solutions that only provide a service at a reduced price will be affected by the recession.
“I fear a lot of startups have really not considered the real commercial reality and return people are looking for,” Holme said.
He also noted the flush of investments in legal technology hasn't translated to higher technology adoption by in-house departments or law firms.
Indeed, less than half of in-house legal departments leverage technology, as innovation in the legal tech tools requires sizable investments. While some corporate counsel say adopting technology is part of preparing for a recession, that only works if one plans ahead.
“A slowdown will hit legal department budgets, and if they haven't invested in legal technology during a boom it's likely they won't during a slowdown,” Holme said.
Still, Holme asserts that data analysis platforms will have the most success during the next recession, particularly because of its wider impact to the corporation's overall finances and risk.
“Everyone in the corporate environment is talking about how to better use data,” Holme said. “[There's] still an opportunity for legal to do that because they do sit on top of this huge amount of data but it hasn't been used.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250