Review: Zero Factors Into DMS Computing for Law Firms
Zero develops a mobile-first native Apple iOS app called Zero for Mobile, and a complementary Outlook add-in called Zero for Desktop Companion.
July 18, 2019 at 07:00 AM
7 minute read
Email software is an efficient tool for lawyers to communicate with clients, colleagues, and even adversaries. But efficiency gains are drained when lawyers manage messages and attachments and move them to a document and email management system (DMS) to organize them by matters. The tasks are problematic and spotty, but not billable.
A DMS, such as iManage Work or NetDocuments, can predict filing locations for email messages from metadata and historical filing information of all users. However, law firms can look beyond a DMS provider to resolve problems, since most DMS platforms support application programming interfaces (APIs) that allow third-party developers to build applications for end users.
Zero, a Los Gatos, California-based company, uses REST (Representational State Transfer) APIs from iManage, NetDocuments, and other DMS providers to help their customers execute faster by predicting and automatically filing email to a DMS. The company also allows customers to implement new business models with mobile time capture. The company's strategy aims to automate processes in software accepted and used by lawyers, such as Microsoft Outlook and iOS, and make itself invisible—a zero footprint.
Zero applies artificial intelligence (AI) and automation to file email messages, threads and attachments to a supported DMS. Moreover, it's fast. Rather than focusing on the centrally stored collective filing habits of all lawyers in a law firm, like iManage and NetDocuments, Zero focuses primarily on an individual lawyer's filing habits.
Zero develops a mobile-first native Apple iOS app called Zero for Mobile, and a complementary Outlook add-in called Zero for Desktop Companion. The iOS app and Outlook add-in use a law firm's Microsoft Exchange environment, so the local devices consume few messaging resources. The application inherits filing parameters from a DMS, in seconds, and respects assigned and walled-off matters, and any other security policies configured in the DMS for users.
|Zero for Mobile
If you can navigate and manage apps on iPhones, it will take little time to become familiar with Zero for Mobile. Although the app does not rely on Apple Mail, users will immediately see some familiar landmarks and filters in the UI, such as “Primary” and “Other” inboxes, and “Important” messages.
Zero for Mobile filters mail by importance, unread mail, attachments, starred, sender, and filed or not filed. The app uses NLP to help identify essential email and surfaces the most urgent. If Zero integrates with a firm's time and billing system, Zero for Mobile can derive message importance from a matter or client's value, calculated from the historical billing information, duration of an attorney-client relationship, and retainer amount. For example, a legal question from a long-term client may receive a higher priority than a new client who wants a status update.
After creating an email message, or opening or replying to an email message or thread from the Primary inbox, Zero predicted the client matter and started capturing the time I spent on the message. If Zero for Mobile didn't anticipate a client matter, I selected one manually.
To complete a narrative for time capture, Zero notes the subject line or conversation topic and applies an activity description to each time entry. Then Zero for Mobile automatically sends time data via API to the firm's time management application. Zero supports all time management applications, including Aderant Expert, Bellefield Systems, Intapp Time, Thomson Reuters Elite, and Tikit Carpe Diem.
Besides time capture, I tested several Zero for Mobile features. I manually and batch filed messages and attachments to a DMS, or folder mapped to a DMS, and set Zero for Mobile to AutoFile—all one-click operations using the Zero for Mobile Assistant.
Zero for Mobile's data loss prevention (DLP) function warned me when sending an email to a recipient outside the firm or matter (Wrong Recipient Detection). DLP will soon come to Zero for Desktop Companion. When I replied to an email message, Zero for Mobile gave me the option to file the reply in the DMS after confirming or editing client attributes or turning on AutoFile.
|Zero for Desktop Companion (Outlook Add-In)
A user familiar with Outlook will have no trouble using Zero for Desktop Companion. The add-in installs to the Outlook Ribbon with intuitive icons and tags.
Depending on Zero's configuration, a user only sees filing options where the probability is more than 97-percent reliable, i.e., a 97-percent confidence level. When the confidence level is below that, Zero presents two or three filing options per message. The highest ranked prediction is featured at the top. Unlike ndMail, a histogram showing the confidence level is not needed.
Zero's email filing options and message attributes result from the configuration settings transferred from a DMS via REST API. In the Zero Desktop Companion I tested with NetDocuments, file mappings for a client, matter, author, document type, and description surfaced when I highlighted a message and clicked “File” from the Zero tab in the Outlook Ribbon. A dialog box opened to “quick file” the email in the DMS using the top filing option.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Del. Court Holds Stance on Musk's $55.8B Pay Rescission, Awards Shareholder Counsel $345M
- 2Another Senior Boeing Attorney Exits, This One for CLO Post at Jet-Maintenance Company
- 3Bridge the Communication Gap: The Benefits of Having (and Being) a Bilingual Mediator
- 4CFIUS Is Locked and Loaded, but What Lies Ahead for CFIUS Enforcement Activity?
- 5Deluge of Trump-Leery Government Lawyers Join Job Market, Setting Up Free-for-All for Law Firm, In-House Openings
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250