LexisNexis Launches Expanded Analytics Tool for Courts' Opinions, Motion Outcomes
LexisNexis's new Context for Courts solution seeks to soften the pains of researching rulings and language most cited by a court.
July 19, 2019 at 11:00 AM
3 minute read
Studying the ruling habits of a court can be daunting when you're staring at thousands of opinions and rulings. In a bid to curb some of that pressure, LexisNexis released LexisNexis Context for Courts.
LexisNexis Context for Courts is the expansion of last year's LexisNexis Context and a part of Lexis Analytics suite.
While LexisNexis Context focused on analyzing judges' language in opinions, motions and rulings, Context for Courts is instead focusing on the decisions made by a court as a whole.
The broader scope of the expansion is intended to assist litigators and legal researchers who are filing a matter before a judge is assigned or deciding what prospective venue to bring a matter.
What it Is: Similar to the LexisNexis Context product, Context for Courts mines court dockets and opinions of all U.S. court systems, excluding administrative court decisions, to provide an overview of a court's motion decisions, opinions cited and practices the court rules on.
When examining a court's motion outcomes, a Context for Courts user not only sees the total motion decisions by a court during a specified time period, but also the number of cases granted, denied or partially granted. Along with the case citation and a link to the opinion, the user can also see the exact language given to grant, deny or partially grant a motion. LexisNexis senior director Nicholas Reed noted this feature as one a lawyer or legal researcher should find particularly valuable.
Under the Hood: While the opinions, legal documents and dockets Context for Courts scours are provided by LexisNexis' trove of legal documents, the technology powering Context for Courts is based on Ravel Law, a company Reed co-founded and was COO of before it was acquired by LexisNexis in 2017.
The competition: To be sure, Context for Courts isn't the first legal tech court analyzer platform. Thomson Reuters' Westlaw Edge 2018 update included a judges, courts, law firms and attorney data analyzer. Likewise, Bloomberg Law also has a judge analysis platform, similar to startup Gavelytics's platform, which expanded its scope to judges in Florida, Texas and Illinois. Fastcase also extended its legal analytics capabilities when it acquired Docket Alarm, a platform that analyzes federal and bankruptcy courts and filings and rulings in the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; International Trade Commission; and Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.
Reed noted Context for Courts differentiates itself from fellow court data analyzers by its focus on contextual analysis and fully understanding and showing how judges are using opinions in their decisions.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 2Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
- 3'It Refreshes Me': King & Spalding Privacy Leader Doubles as Equestrian Champ
- 4Class Action Filed Against Houston Health Savings Account Firm for Allegedly Confiscating Client Funds
- 5These 2 Lawyers Just Became Florida Judges
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250