Equifax Reaches $1.4 Billion Settlement in Data Breach Class Action
The civil settlement includes a commitment by the company to spend $1 billion on cybersecurity measures over the next five years and establish a $380.5 million fund to pay for four years of credit monitoring and financial help.
July 22, 2019 at 06:54 AM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Equifax has agreed to pay at least $1.4 billion to settle multidistrict litigation brought on behalf of 147 million consumers, and pay millions more to resolve civil complaints brought by the federal government and multiple state attorneys general over its massive 2017 data breach.
Monday's notice of the proposed settlement, detailed in court papers filed in Atlanta, would largely resolve the legal fallout from consumers whose personal and financial data was hacked following one of the nation's largest data breaches.
The civil settlement—which Equifax counsel and lawyers representing the consumer class were expected to announce at a hearing in U.S. District Court in Atlanta Monday morning—includes a commitment by the company to spend $1 billion on cybersecurity measures over the next five years and establish a $380.5 million fund to pay for four years of credit monitoring and financial help, where needed, in resolving identity theft issues for victimized consumers.
The fund would also reimburse consumers for expenses incurred in securing their personal information or repairing stolen identities after Equifax belatedly acknowledged the breach, according to the settlement terms.
Equifax also committed to expand the fund by at least another $125 million for excess out-of-pocket losses by consumers and, potentially make available as much as $2 billion more if all 147 million consumers sign on, according to the terms.
The plaintiff consumers' notice of settlement stated the retail value of the credit services alone would exceed $282 billion, or $1,920 per consumer, if all 147 million class members take advantage of Equifax's settlement offer. Equifax will not benefit from the credit protection services, which will be handled by Ireland-based consumer reporting agency Experian, according to the settlement terms.
Attorneys for the consumer class who negotiated the deal will receive about $77.5 million from the fund, according to the settlement agreement.
Retired U.S. District Judge Layn Phillips of the Western District of Oklahoma mediated the settlement agreement. Phillips is the founder of Phillips ADR Enterprises in California.
The consumer class settlement also includes provisions for an innovative publicity campaign that will incorporate tools used in modern commercial and political advertising to reach class members through radio, print, mail, email and social media about their eligibility to file claims, and gives them an extended time frame for doing so.
Equifax and counsel for the consumer class reached a binding settlement agreement in March, according to settlement documents. Equifax then shared the terms with federal regulators and state attorneys general, according to the documents. Plaintiffs' lawyers agreed to consider suggested alterations to the deal but were not bound to accept any changes regulators proposed before reaching their own separate deals with Equifax. All consumer remuneration and benefits will be administered through the Atlanta class action settlement, according to the settlement terms.
Separate civil settlements have been reached with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the Federal Trade Commission, and 50 state attorneys general, according to New York Attorney General Letitia James, including $100 million for the CFPB and $175 million in fines to be distributed to the states. New York will receive more than $9 million, she said.
The New York State Department of Financial Services also separately investigated Equifax's security practices, and fined the company an additional $10 million for violating the federal Dodd-Frank Act and New York financial services laws, James said.
Shortly after Equifax went public about the breach in September 2017, a number of state attorneys general signed a letter to the company's lawyers expressing “profound concerns” about its delay in notifying the public of the breach, and its decision to continue to charge consumers for its own credit-monitoring services or for placing security freezes on their credit reports.
A team of King & Spalding attorneys led by partners Phyllis Sumner and David Balser represent Equifax. They negotiated the deal after U.S. District Chief Judge Thomas Thrash refused to dismiss the multidistrict litigation last January. Last December, the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Oversight and Government Reform released a report concluding the data breach was preventable.
Attorneys representing dozens of plaintiffs on behalf of the consumer class include lead counsel Ken Canfield of Atlanta's Doffermyre Shields Canfield & Knowles; Norman Siegel of Kansas City's Stueve Siegel and Amy Keller of Chicago's DiCello Levitt. Former Georgia Gov. Roy Barnes of The Barnes Law Group in Marietta, and David Worley, a partner at Atlanta's Evangelista Worley serve as liaison counsel.
The steering committee includes Andrew Friedman of Washington's Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll; Eric Gibbs of Girard Gibbs in Oakland, California; James Pizzirusso of Hausfeld in Washington; Ariana Tadler of New York's Milberg Tadler Phillips Grossman; John Yanchunis of Morgan & Morgan in Tampa; William Murphy III of Murphy, Falcon & Murphy of Baltimore, and Marietta attorney Jason Doss.
Thrash is also presiding over a separate group of lawsuits filed against Equifax by a number of financial institutions that issued debit or credit cards to consumers whose personal information was compromised and then were faced with helping customers clean up the resulting mess.
Benefits available to class members include:
- Compensation of up to 20 hours at $25 an hour — including as much as 10 hours that can be self-certified with no documentation—for time spent taking preventative measures or dealing with identity theft.
- Reimbursement of up to $20,000 for documented losses traceable to the breach, including the cost of freezing or unfreezing credit files, buying credit monitoring services, out-of-pocket losses from identity theft or fraud, and professional fees associated with identity theft.
- A 25% refund to customers who bought credit monitoring or identity theft protection subscriptions from Equifax the year before the breach.
- Four years of three-bureau credit monitoring and identity protection services through Experian, a $1200 value, and an additional six years of one-bureau credit monitoring by Equifax, valued at $720.
- Alternative compensation of $125 for class members who already have credit monitoring or protection services in place.
- Identity restoration services through Experian to help class members for seven years who have been the victims of identity theft, including assignment of a certified identity theft restoration specialist and step-by-step assistance in dealing with credit bureaus, companies, and government agencies.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1The Growing PFAS Morass: Why Insurance Should Cover These Products Liability Claims
- 2Dallas Jury Awards $98.65M in Botham Jean Killing by Dallas Officer
- 3In Talc Bankruptcy, Andy Birchfield Skipped His Deposition. Could He Face Sanctions?
- 4Pharmaceutical Patents: Benefits and Challenges
- 5Where Do Web-Tracking Class Actions Belong? 8th Circuit Weighs the Issue
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250