How Law Schools' Online Classes Are Supporting Rise of 'Virtual Law'
Law schools have launched online courses to cater to students who are unable to relocate or abandon steady work, but as more jobs go virtual, those programs may become an unexpected training ground for the careers of the future.
August 09, 2019 at 09:00 AM
3 minute read
More law schools are beginning to offer students the opportunity to participate in online courses, potentially allowing candidates facing geographical or employment-related barriers to pursue a legal education and—eventually—a legal career.
But there may be another unexpected fringe benefit awaiting those students once graduation rolls around. The shift toward online coursework also complements a larger, industry-agnostic trend toward remote working and virtual offices, which requires employees to be fluent in digital communication skills and possess an ability to work independently.
According to Jared Coseglia, founder and CEO at cybersecurity, e-discovery and privacy staffing firm Tru Staffing Partners, 27% of the job placements his organization made in 2018 were for remote working opportunities, an increase of 20% from 2014.
"Gaining an education and knowing how to self-educate through virtual technology is leverage for telling an employer that you'll be successful working from home and so many more jobs are virtual," Coseglia said.
Many of the competitive advantages that students may be receiving are ancillary to any legal knowledge or even tech-related skills that may be built into the curriculum. Yaacov Silberman, a founding partner and the chief operating officer at Rimon PC, doesn't think that success as a remote employee is even about technical prowess.
"I think there is sort of a cultural, behavioral, interpersonal quality you have to have if you're working at home," Silberman said.
It's nothing new to consider higher education as an experience that teaches students the behaviors and social protocols that will be expected of them in the workplace. However, online education may be expanding on those traditional graces by requiring those engaged to develop and maintain their personal brands and reputations primarily online.
Students comprising the first cohort of the University of New Hampshire School of Law's hybrid J.D. program, which allows participants to complete the vast majority of their coursework online, recently partook in a virtual open house. University dean Megan Carpenter said that she was originally nervous about how the students would develop a sense of community without much face-to-face time, but those fears were allayed once students took the initiative to exchange phone numbers and break up into smaller chat groups online.
"Their ability to really engage in the online space in the classroom is really what they're going to be doing in the practice of law. Their clients are not going to work down the street from them," Carpenter said.
However, client relationships may not be the ones that most benefit from an online education. Silberman pointed out that even if they happened to share the same building, attorneys and their clients have typically communicated through the use of technology. Interfirm relationships, on the other hand, have been tweaked by the rise of the virtual workplace.
Remote workers, for example, need to be more proactive about seeking and delivering feedback. Building inter-team relationships also requires a deliberate effort. Rimon has an internal social media system where employees can share items of professional relevance, but those who inject some personal appeal can also see dividends.
"The occasional picture of them with their family or on their vacation or commenting on people's posts, they develop a certain reputation within the organization that I think is important," Silberman said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Senators Grill Visa, Mastercard Execs on Alleged Anti-Competitive Practices, Fees
- 2Deal Watch: Gibson Dunn, V&E, Kirkland Lead Big Energy Deals in Another Strong Week in Transactions
- 3Advisory Opinion Offers 'Road Map' for Judges Defending Against Campaign Attacks
- 4Commencement of Child Victims Act at Heart of Federal Question Posed to NY's Top Court
- 5Bolstering Southern California Presence, Sidley Austin Settles Into Revitalized Downtown LA Office
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250