Digital Divide: US Government's Mandated E-Signature Adoption Hitting Roadblocks
According to some software companies, the U.S. government has been slow to adopt e-signature, and barriers aren't just related to budgeting issues.
August 12, 2019 at 09:00 AM
3 minute read
In late 2018, the 21st Century Integrated Digital Experience (IDEA) Act was signed into law. The legislation was heralded by the software industry for requiring government agencies to make public-facing documents more digitally accessible, and allowing for electronic signatures.
However, like private industry, the public sector is facing a host of challenges in making e-signature technology a reality, including tight budgets and having to assure the integrity of the data collection and storage process.
“Legacy technology [and the] crisis du jour makes people not focus on e-signature,” said Margo Tank, DLA Piper’s financial services sector U.S. co-chair. “The laws and regulations are there to enable electronic signature but there’s resistance.”
Indeed, while the 21st Century IDEA Act was enacted last December, software companies see varying adoption rates of e-signature software.
“Since the bill was signed into law, we have seen an uptick in government agencies adopting e-signature services to meet the ongoing mandates of the 21st Century IDEA [Act]” wrote Dan Puterbaugh, director of strategic development with Adobe Document Cloud, in an email.
However, DocuSign vice president of enterprise sales Barton Phillips said he hasn’t seen an increase in the public sector adopting e-signature tech. “Part of that is because the 21st Century IDEA Act didn’t come with funding,”
To be sure, the transition from paper to electronic comes with a host of challenges besides just funding.
“I think there’s been a lot of pause on, not so much about the signature but the other issues related to the transactions,” Tank said, pointing to problems in authenticating the parties involved in the transaction and maintaining the records’ integrity.
Plus, regulators have been silent over enforcement of the 21st Century IDEA Act, while case law is only beginning to trickle in, Tank added.
Tank and software companies agreed e-signature is used more often in the private sector, and the onus is now on the government to catch up.
“[The] ‘I agree’ button is an electronic signature so yes, consumer commercial private industries are absolutely utilizing electronic signature,” Tank said. “The government needs a little bit of a push.”
To be sure, the use and acceptance of e-signatures and digital records has been encouraged by U.S. lawmakers for 20-plus years, Tank said .
In 1999, the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act guaranteeing electronic transactions’ enforceability was adopted by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws and later by all states, Tank noted.
Likewise, in 2000, the E-Sign Act made clear that electronic signatures and documents could be accepted by the U.S. government, while by 2003 the Government Paperwork Elimination Act allowed individuals or entities that deal with federal agencies to submit signatures, information or maintain records electronically, Tank added.
“The Government Paperwork Elimination Act says, ‘Hey government, you need to be more efficient. Look at laws and regulations and start thinking through what can be done electronically.’ The 21st Century IDEA Act is following those footsteps basically of the Government Paperwork Elimination Act and saying the government needs to go electronic,” she said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Del. Court Holds Stance on Musk's $55.8B Pay Rescission, Awards Shareholder Counsel $345M
- 2Another Senior Boeing Attorney Exits, This One for CLO Post at Jet-Maintenance Company
- 3Bridge the Communication Gap: The Benefits of Having (and Being) a Bilingual Mediator
- 4CFIUS Is Locked and Loaded, but What Lies Ahead for CFIUS Enforcement Activity?
- 5Deluge of Trump-Leery Government Lawyers Join Job Market, Setting Up Free-for-All for Law Firm, In-House Openings
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250