Digital Divide: US Government's Mandated E-Signature Adoption Hitting Roadblocks
According to some software companies, the U.S. government has been slow to adopt e-signature, and barriers aren't just related to budgeting issues.
August 12, 2019 at 09:00 AM
3 minute read
In late 2018, the 21st Century Integrated Digital Experience (IDEA) Act was signed into law. The legislation was heralded by the software industry for requiring government agencies to make public-facing documents more digitally accessible, and allowing for electronic signatures.
However, like private industry, the public sector is facing a host of challenges in making e-signature technology a reality, including tight budgets and having to assure the integrity of the data collection and storage process.
“Legacy technology [and the] crisis du jour makes people not focus on e-signature,” said Margo Tank, DLA Piper’s financial services sector U.S. co-chair. “The laws and regulations are there to enable electronic signature but there’s resistance.”
Indeed, while the 21st Century IDEA Act was enacted last December, software companies see varying adoption rates of e-signature software.
“Since the bill was signed into law, we have seen an uptick in government agencies adopting e-signature services to meet the ongoing mandates of the 21st Century IDEA [Act]” wrote Dan Puterbaugh, director of strategic development with Adobe Document Cloud, in an email.
However, DocuSign vice president of enterprise sales Barton Phillips said he hasn’t seen an increase in the public sector adopting e-signature tech. “Part of that is because the 21st Century IDEA Act didn’t come with funding,”
To be sure, the transition from paper to electronic comes with a host of challenges besides just funding.
“I think there’s been a lot of pause on, not so much about the signature but the other issues related to the transactions,” Tank said, pointing to problems in authenticating the parties involved in the transaction and maintaining the records’ integrity.
Plus, regulators have been silent over enforcement of the 21st Century IDEA Act, while case law is only beginning to trickle in, Tank added.
Tank and software companies agreed e-signature is used more often in the private sector, and the onus is now on the government to catch up.
“[The] ‘I agree’ button is an electronic signature so yes, consumer commercial private industries are absolutely utilizing electronic signature,” Tank said. “The government needs a little bit of a push.”
To be sure, the use and acceptance of e-signatures and digital records has been encouraged by U.S. lawmakers for 20-plus years, Tank said .
In 1999, the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act guaranteeing electronic transactions’ enforceability was adopted by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws and later by all states, Tank noted.
Likewise, in 2000, the E-Sign Act made clear that electronic signatures and documents could be accepted by the U.S. government, while by 2003 the Government Paperwork Elimination Act allowed individuals or entities that deal with federal agencies to submit signatures, information or maintain records electronically, Tank added.
“The Government Paperwork Elimination Act says, ‘Hey government, you need to be more efficient. Look at laws and regulations and start thinking through what can be done electronically.’ The 21st Century IDEA Act is following those footsteps basically of the Government Paperwork Elimination Act and saying the government needs to go electronic,” she said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250