Lexis Advance's CourtLink Integration Brings Solution into Modern Age
LexisNexis is folding court docket and document solution CourtLink into Lexis Advance as part of an overall effort to make the user experience less bumpy and promote greater efficiency.
August 12, 2019 at 01:41 PM
3 minute read
A new feature allows CourtLink users to have case updates delivered regularly. Screenshot courtesy of LexisNexis.
LexisNexis Legal & Professional announced early Monday morning that its CourtLink court docket and document solution has been integrated into the company’s legal research platform Lexis Advance.
Among other things, this means that users will now be able to access CourtLink via the Lexis Advance mobile app. They’ll also be able to access both CourtLink and Lexis Advance using a single username and password, which speaks to the overarching motivation behind the integration in the first place: Bringing CourtLink into the modern age of solutions.
Eric Olson, director of litigation solutions at LexisNexis, said the company relied on customer feedback to help get them there.
“Frankly, the biggest customer complaint we got is, your courts are great, your functionality is terrific, but your product is really hard to use. It’s old, it’s got too many steps in the way to get things done and it’s just not a modern tool,” he said.
So what constitutes a modern tool these days? For starters, a docket or document search can be now be executed, filters and all, from a single screen as opposed to the five that users had previously been required to navigate. There are also fewer steps required to manage the CourtLink alerts regarding new litigation activity on a case, which can be setup in conjunction with alerts from Lexis Advance and timed on a daily, weekly or monthly basis.
In other words, it’s about efficiency. Operational efficiency has remained a critical element of focus for law firms looking to maintain a competitive edge against alternative legal service providers. Such an environment puts pressure on solutions to be more intuitive and user friendly in a manner that echoes the technology platforms attorneys are engaging with in their personal lives.
“It’s often very, very hard to get the end user of the data, the attorney, to attend training. They have actual other work to do than learn how to use our products,” Olson said.
Even the decision to fold CourtLink into Lexis Advance could be seen as a play towards efficiency by allowing users to engage multiple functions under a single system, although Olson pointed out that LexisNexis has been steadily integrating more of its products with the legal research platform for some time now.
This holds especially true for data analytics and visualization technology that came with LexisNexis’ acquisitions of Ravel Law or Lex Machina. To be sure, with the integration, CourtLink users will now be able to search the case histories of attorneys, judges or law firms associated with a particular docket using Lex Machina analytics.
Despite all of the new bells and whistles, the ultimate test for the revamped CourtLink might still come down to whether or not users experience a smoother ride than before.
“We knew that the difficulty of using the product was effecting the breadth of use, and we hope to get a much sort of broader audience now,” Olson said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250