Tech GCs Say It's an 'Interesting Time' to Be a GC at ABA Panel
General counsel from Lyft, Oracle, 23andMe and Microsoft weighed in on legal's role in tech companies; diversity in-house and at firms; and working with regulators at an ABA annual meeting panel Friday.
August 12, 2019 at 01:00 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
Tech general counsel shared their innovation and diversity experiences at an American Bar Association annual meeting panel Friday in San Francisco.
The session, moderated by RafterMarsh U.S. principal Heather Rafter, brought together Lyft Inc.’s Kristin Sverchek, Microsoft Corp.’s Dev Stahlkopf, Oracle Corp.’s Dorian Daley and 23andMe’s Kathy Hibbs, all of whom lead legal teams working with emerging technology and regulations.
“It’s an interesting time to be [a] general counsel in tech, for sure. I wake up every day and the issue’s a little bit different. … It’s really issues where technology is moving so quickly that it’s outpacing social dialogue about it, outpacing regulations,” Stahlkopf said. She was promoted to Redmond, Washington-based Microsoft’s general counsel role last year.
Some of those issues include facial recognition, autonomous vehicles and artificial intelligence, the panelists said.
The general counsel all said they have worked with regulators on policies and education around innovative technologies that may not yet have clear legal guidelines. Daley said her team has worked with regulators worldwide. She, Sverchek and Stahlkopf all said they’ve teamed up with others in the industry, including competitors, to advance common goals.
Internally, the general counsel agreed ensuring new tech complies with the law as best as possible means getting lawyers embedded in product teams. Sverchek said Lyft has “several” lawyers working with its product team at any given time.
“Part of our jobs is built on embedding our teams with the development organization so that as these issues come up … we’ve got people that are right there having that discussion with developers,” Daley said. She has been the general counsel of Redwood City, California-based Oracle since 2007.
It’s also about spotting issues before they arise, Stahlkopf said.
Her team is currently working to improve facial recognition technology’s ability to identify diverse faces before launching the technology. Public data sets mostly include white male faces, which made tools less able to discern women and people of color’s faces and could lead to “bias that could be pretty harmful” if not addressed proactively, she said.
The importance of having varied input on emerging technologies is one reason Stahlkopf and the other general counsel panelists said they have pushed for increasing diversity in-house and at the firms they hire.
“We are working on cutting-edge technology. We need people from a diversity of backgrounds to be able to really do that, looking around corners, proactively identifying issues. … If the data set is all white men you’re necessarily missing part of the broader picture,” Sverchek said.
Sverchek, who has led San Francisco-based Lyft’s legal team since its founding, is one of more than 200 general counsel who signed on to a letter pushing firms to diversify earlier this year. She and the other panelists, all women, said their roles as legal execs at large tech companies have allowed them to spot and promote diverse talent.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSEC Fines 4 Companies $7M for Downplaying Breaches Tied to Massive SolarWinds Hack
Joseph Saveri Law Firm, Co-Counsel File 9th Circuit Appeal in Lawsuit Targeting GitHub's Use of Code to Train AI Models
Legal Leaders See AI's Multitude of Uses as Both Blessing and Curse
Lawyers Are Adopting Gen AI Five Times Faster Than the Cloud
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 4Trump Files $10B Suit Against CBS in Amarillo Federal Court
- 5Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250