California Attorney General On the Hunt for CCPA Enforcers
California Attorney General Xavier Becerra has started the hiring process for three lawyers who will help "implement and enforce" the California Consumer Privacy Act.
August 13, 2019 at 02:00 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
Xavier Becerra, attorney general of California, testifies before the U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation on Sept. 19, 2017. (Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM)
Help wanted: Attorneys with an interest in California’s cutting-edge privacy law, one that’s shaping the national dialogue on digital data regulations. Must be able to defend the inevitable lawsuits, provide free counsel to affected businesses and adjust to still-developing regulations and legislative changes in the space. Pay: Not exactly comparable to Big Law.
California Attorney General Xavier Becerra has started the hiring process for lawyers who will help “implement and enforce” the California Consumer Privacy Act. The law, which gives consumers the right to opt out of the sale of their personal information, goes into effect in January.
Job postings on the attorney general’s website seek midlevel deputy attorneys general to work in the consumer law section in the Los Angeles, San Diego and San Francisco offices. “The initial assignment for these positions will include the enforcement of privacy laws,” the description reads. Becerra’s press office confirmed the new hires will work on the Consumer Privacy Act.
The attorney positions—the Department of Justice’s website listed three as of Monday—appear to be the first of eight created in the governor’s 2019-2020 budget to help handle what Becerra has predicted will be an enormous workload generated by the new law.
The Privacy Act gives the attorney general the sole authority to enforce most of its provisions, which apply to businesses with gross revenues of $25 million or more or those that buy, sell or share the data of 50,000 or more consumers. The International Association of Privacy Professionals calculated that the regulations will apply to more than 500,000 U.S. companies.
The law also allows businesses and third parties to ask the attorney general for guidance on complying with its provisions.
Becerra and his representatives have complained that even with the boosted staffing and an additional $4.7 million budgeted for the law’s enforcement, the department is unlikely to have the resources to take many wide-ranging actions against suspected violators.
At a state Senate committee hearing in April, Stacey Schesser, supervising deputy attorney general for the consumer law section’s privacy unit, said her office, even if expanded, may only have the capacity to handle three major cases a year.
“There’s 40 million Californians and the scope of businesses that the CCPA applies to is significantly large,” Schesser said.
Becerra backed ultimately unsuccessful legislation this spring that would have created a private right of action for consumers to pursue violations. The bill also would have dropped the requirement that the attorney general offer compliance opinions to businesses and instead allow him to simply provide advisory materials.
The Attorney General’s Office is currently drafting regulations, expected later this year, spelling out how the law will operate. Becerra has said enforcement will begin in June 2020.
The privacy-attorney positions advertised on the Department of Justice’s website would be classified as deputy attorneys general III. The salary for that job title ranges between $110,520 and $141,780.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1'Translate Across Disciplines': Paul Hastings’ New Tech Transactions Leader
- 2Milbank’s Revenue and Profits Surge Following Demand Increases Across the Board
- 3Fourth Quarter Growth in Demand and Worked Rates Coincided with Countercyclical Dip, New Report Indicates
- 4Public Notices/Calendars
- 5Monday Newspaper
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250