'Old MacDonald’ Had A Tort Claim: Judge Remixes Nursery Rhymes for Bar Prep
At 53, New York City Civil Court Judge Josh Hanshaft may call himself “old school,” but his app My BarTunes takes a decidedly new-school approach to memorizing core legal concepts.
August 14, 2019 at 11:00 AM
3 minute read
In a bid to enhance legal education, one New York City judge has made the move from the bench to the App Store. New York City Civil Court Judge Josh Hanshaft recently developed and launched My BarTunes, an app that pairs core law school subjects to age-old nursery rhymes to assist law students studying for the bar exam.
My BarTunes focuses on legal concepts taught in first-year law schools’ evidence, contracts, constitutional law, real property, civil procedure, criminal law and torts courses, and matches them to the melodies of nursery rhymes including “Three Blind Mouse” and “The Farmer in the Dell.” Hanshaft said he combined his love of music and 20-plus years as an attorney and judge to help address the intense preparation needed to pass the bar exam and common first year-law school courses.
“It’s so much material when you are a first-year law student or taking the bar that every way to prepare is very important for law school students,” Hanshaft explained.
Although a developer coded the app, it took roughly seven years to create the content for My BarTunes, with Hanshaft working primarily on relearning all of the subjects and creating melodies.
“The process was basically: learn all the subjects, boil it down to what is necessary to know about the subject, find the song and put the words to lyrics that go with the song and then make sure everything rhymes and makes sense and review it,” he explained.
Hanshaft released his app without a background in technology. While he has no plans to release more apps, he said it’s becoming imperative that judges have some understanding of technology when making judgments in a high-stakes environment.
“Criminal Court judges are signing warrants all the time,” he said. “If you don’t understand the technology, how can I sign a warrant about a crime that was committed or information involved in searching those materials unless I understand what that material is? You have to [understand it], you really don’t have a choice.”
Hanshaft noted that although older judges nearing retirement aren’t placing an emphasis on leverage technology, more court system are adopting new software to help streamline tasks.
“You need to see what a judge did six [court] appearances ago and following the history of a case is much easier when it’s automated,” he said. “There are many different areas that frees up other people who are processing paperwork. They don’t have to do that as much because they can look on the computer and find it easier as opposed to having buckets of paperwork to find what they need.”
Hanshaft said he expects more courtrooms to adopt technology to match the expectations of the incoming younger generations of lawyers. In the meantime, as courtrooms wait for tech resources, cases before judges are focusing more and more on modern technology.
“There’s a lot of crime that has to do with computers and identity fraud, and cooking the books is now more technical,” he added. “Judges have to be aware and up on technology.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250