'Too Practical'? Why Some Law Schools Don't Offer E-Discovery Education
E-discovery-specific courses are slow to appear in law schools' course catalogs, but some argue e-discovery is becoming too common and too case-altering for schools to ignore.
August 20, 2019 at 11:00 AM
3 minute read
Recent law school graduates are entering a profession that is quickly adapting to the digital world around it. However, most U.S. law schools aren't providing e-discovery courses to prepare new lawyers for the potential work of examining and preserving electronic data.
"I think part of the reason is they may not see the importance of e-discovery or see it as very—almost ironically—too practical," said Drexel University Thomas R. Kline School of Law Dean Daniel Filler.
While some law schools may view e-discovery as a practical skill they can learn later on the job, Filler's law school takes a different approach by offering its students a standalone e-discovery course.
"I think a big part of 21st century legal practice is making sure that lawyers are sophisticated enough with technology that they remain in control [and make] sure they really protect their clients," Filler said. "There is a risk with this move toward technology that they will not understand it well enough and refer to nonlawyers."
But not all law schools see the need for dedicated e-discovery education. While Concord Law School associate dean of faculty and professor Shaun Jamison said his law school doesn't offer an e-discovery course, he noted that e-discovery is intertwined into other classes. "Having the [e-discovery] basics would be enough to understand what the issues are," he said.
Until e-discovery becomes more common across legal practices, Jamison doesn't see more law schools implementing e-discovery-specific courses.
To be sure, to meet their e-discovery needs, law firms have turned to technologists or offered on-site e-discovery training for their own staff.
But Filler said having an e-discovery background out of law school can be a competitive asset for those applying to, or working, in midsize and smaller firms. "[Midsize and boutique firms] really look to the junior lawyers and they want the junior lawyers to bring a wide array of skills."
Andrea D'Ambra, who teaches an e-discovery course at Temple University's Beasley School of Law and William & Mary Law School while leading Norton Rose Fulbright's U.S. e-discovery and information governance practice, argued that basic e-discovery knowledge is essential for litigators as electronic information grows in volume and complexity.
"We are really dealing with text messages, social media pages, emails and Slack and all these methods of communication that are really prevalent in the business world and are not necessarily easy to preserve and collect to [show] to opposing parties."
While D'Ambra noted that name-dropping an e-discovery course won't get a law student an immediate job, she said it will likely get them noticed on the job.
"I think it's undervalued when you are in the interview process but I will say I have countless students that have written to me after they get into their law firm and they say they were immediately useful to the partners."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250