Why Tech Companies Transcribing of User Audio Isn't Unusual
Leveraging contractors to listen and transcribe private recordings is common in the tech industry. However, users should be notified of that expectation, lawyers said.
August 23, 2019 at 11:30 AM
3 minute read
In recent months, Facebook, Google, Amazon, Microsoft and Apple have revealed their products' technological advancements aren't entirely fueled solely by automated machines. News publications have discovered the tech giants rely on contractors to listen and transcribe audio recordings made through their products to improve accuracy.
Lawyers say the process doesn't run afoul of privacy laws—as long as users are notified that their information could be used by a third-party.
Although it's a common tech industry practice to have voice recordings transcribed by a third-party, it isn't expected by most users of tech platforms. In turn, companies must inform and obtain consent from consumers "if the activity is something the consumer would not expect. You have to tell them," said Francoise Gilbert, DataMinding CEO and former co-chair of Greenberg Traurig's data, privacy and cybersecurity practice group.
"So in this particular case, I would advise the client to make sure they disclose the activity they have so the consumer is aware of what is happening. Then the consumer has a chance to agree or disagree, but not be surprised."
Gilbert noted the recording's content may not meet the definition of personal information under U.S. or international privacy laws.
"If it is reasonably possible to know who is speaking, then the information is personal information, and then there are questions that can be raised. But if there is no possibility to associate a recording to a particular person, that is not personal information," she said.
Gilbert also added that privacy laws in varying jurisdictions include similar wording when defining personal information, including a location, full name, IP address and other identifying information.
Although the type of information obtained is important when questioning what regulations apply, age also is a significant factor in determining what laws govern the collection and usage of voice recordings.
To be sure, the companies' procedures of transcribing recordings grabbed some headlines because of their popularity with the general population, including children. In the U.S., websites and online services targeting children must comply with the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA).
Under COPPA, websites or online services targeting children under 13 requires parents or guardians to provide "meaningful parental consent," explained Duquesne University School of Law professor Agnieszka McPeak.
A parental consent agreement "says they are allowed to use certain things, and that consent has to have a detailed disclosure of what they need to do," McPeak said. While companies that collect underage children's voice recordings must meet specific requirements, the practice of using human transcribers to listen to recordings is a standard practice for most tech companies, lawyers said.
"That is the way artificial intelligence, and before AI, machine learning, works. The machine has to learn, and for the machine to learn things, it needs to be taught and it needs to be corrected," Gilbert said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250