Similari's Patent Search Program Wants to Grease, Not Break, the Wheel
Similari's self-named patent search program, which leverages AI to help identify and compare the unique ideas contained in various patent documents, is the latest of a growing number of technologies looking to change the patent market.
August 30, 2019 at 10:30 AM
4 minute read
Similari is betting that harried inventors still don't want to play the patent equivalent of "Where's Waldo." The Tel-Aviv based company brought its patent analysis service to the U.S. this week following its first-place finish in the Israel Patent Office's test of automated search tools.
In the U.S., Similari is hoping to set itself apart from other entries in the market by focusing on the ideas in a patent document instead of the actual words.
What is is: Similari is an automated patent search tool that leverages AI and natural language processing to search through the hundreds of thousands of published patents to determine whether or not a new invention falls too close for comfort.
The idea is to give companies a mechanism by which to avoid sinking vast amounts of capital or resources into a concept that has already been spoken for down at the patent office.
Udi Cohen, Similari's CEO, indicated that the company is not looking to totally break the wheel.
"We're not generating a new market, we're just helping the existing market to become more efficient and more proficient with their search," Cohen said.
Why it's Necessary: Per Cohen, the number of published patents that inventors and patent offices have to sort through continues to grow steadily. Plus, two separate entities are apt to use any number of different phrases or words to describe virtually the same idea, which can make accurately executing a fruitful patent search challenging.
Therefore, Similari's target demographic occupies both ends of the spectrum—companies who want to safeguard their investment, and patent offices charged with making sure that new ideas don't bear uncomfortable resemblances to ones that have already been registered.
Under the Hood: Similari's service relies in no small part on artificial intelligence (AI), which means that Cohen and his co-founders Ori Calvo and Tommy Sandbank had to train the tool how to parse a document for content and ideas instead of just words.
But how? The team used a database of past search results that a human examiner had found to be similar to one another so that the AI powering their tool could learn to make the same distinctions.
Just because the tool is active now doesn't mean it will stop learning. Cohen envisions a future beyond patent documents where the tool could potentially be used to compare literature.
"On the database side, we will of course continue to integrate more and more data to make it more comprehensive and able to find documents in places that are even harder to search for," Cohen said.
The Competition: Where there's a problem, there's usually a crowd of people willing to solve it in exchange for cash not far behind.
Similari's competitors include the visual search engine platform DesignVision, which allows users to drop images into a search field and cast a net for similar works. Meanwhile, the InnVenn platform offered by a startup called Loci uses Venn diagrams to help visually inclined overlaps in patent searches.
Also, while not strictly a patent search tool, the law firm of Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton did make its KT Extranet portal available to clients earlier this year, allowing them to monitor docket information surrounding issued or pending patents.
Similari, meanwhile, is banking on securing a reputation for accuracy to help it remain vital and relevant in the marketplace.
"From the technology side, we're constantly benchmarking ourselves and improving our accuracy… It's something that the market needs. It's a real problem that we're solving," Cohen said
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Cars Reach Record Fuel Economy but Largely Fail to Meet Biden's EPA Standard, Agency Says
- 2How Cybercriminals Exploit Law Firms’ Holiday Vulnerabilities
- 3DOJ Asks 5th Circuit to Publish Opinion Upholding Gun Ban for Felon
- 4GEO Group Sued Over 2 Wrongful Deaths
- 5Revenue Up at Homegrown Texas Firms Through Q3, Though Demand Slipped Slightly
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250