Legal Tech's Revolution is Exacerbating Mental Health Issues. How Can We Fix the Problem?
While legal technology's thousand-mile-an-hour expansion has opened theoretical opportunities for lawyers flex their creativity, the cultural change is still missing.
September 04, 2019 at 07:00 AM
4 minute read
|
Anyone who has watched the TV show Suits will likely remember dozens of legal associates trawling through reams of documents, all in the same cramped room, late into the night. As archaic as those scenes now look, we know this often happened during a typical associate's legal career.
Artificial intelligence now frees up time for everyday lawyers, who are no longer chained to their desks and now brimming with capacity to take on strategic responsibility. Whether that means crunching down on cases, winning new business, or coming up with fresh and innovative ideas to benefit the firm, surely lawyers are more able to leave the monotony behind and engage with the higher-end work that really matters to the business.
That's the promise anyway, but is it reality?
Unfortunately, many signs suggest this is not the case, and this is negatively impacting lawyers' mental health.
While legal technology's thousand-mile-an-hour expansion has opened theoretical opportunities for lawyers flex their creativity, the cultural change is still missing. Lawyers used to feel pressure to stay late into the night with their paperwork. Now, while that pressure is much less common, they are instead expected to stay tuned-in 24/7 to clients' demands.
Put simply, because they can be logged on anywhere, they must always be logged on.
Obviously, this can be taxing. First and foremost, lawyers are advisers and sounding boards for their clients' concerns. Paramount to any lawyer's success is devising and delivering a measured, strategic response in high-pressure situations. Piling the best and brightest associates under the demand to subscribe to an "always switched-on" culture runs the risk of encouraging them to rush, and burn out.
Not being allowed time to react with skill instead of speed, these lawyers will be increasingly unable to stand out at their firms. Their careers may stall, and they may develop stress and mental health issues.
The stakes are high. And the more we let technology run away from us without managing cultural change, the more we alienate new associates and discourage them from growing into their roles.
So what is the solution? Increased and widespread education can go a long way. While as an industry we are getting a better grip on the issue, long-established business practices—like employee training—often have not changed in-step with technology. Law firms are leaving associates ill-equipped to handle a world that never turns off. That means associates are often anxious and overwhelmed by the task of getting up to speed in their legal career.
Central to all of this is the need for companies to understand what "digital training" means before they offer it. It does not mean teaching your employees how to use a new tool, nor is it about adding technology into a centuries-old skill set, such as drafting contracts. Instead, it means teaching lawyers that the world is moving too quickly for old-style client deliverables to keep up.
Proper training teaches lawyers how to feel comfortable and competent in the new world. The more confident they feel, the less stressed they will be and the more likely it is that they will fulfill their potential.
Regardless of how tech-savvy you might think your new associates are, they still need this training and onboarding—an introduction to exactly how technology is disrupting the world of law. Without it, you risk withholding from them of the tools they need to become an effective and efficient legal practitioner.
Dan Reed is the CEO of UnitedLex, which leads large-scale business transformation projects for global companies. Prior to this, Dan worked as general counsel and CFO to a number of public and private equity-backed companies.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250