Legal Tech's Revolution is Exacerbating Mental Health Issues. How Can We Fix the Problem?
While legal technology's thousand-mile-an-hour expansion has opened theoretical opportunities for lawyers flex their creativity, the cultural change is still missing.
September 04, 2019 at 07:00 AM
4 minute read
Anyone who has watched the TV show Suits will likely remember dozens of legal associates trawling through reams of documents, all in the same cramped room, late into the night. As archaic as those scenes now look, we know this often happened during a typical associate's legal career.
Artificial intelligence now frees up time for everyday lawyers, who are no longer chained to their desks and now brimming with capacity to take on strategic responsibility. Whether that means crunching down on cases, winning new business, or coming up with fresh and innovative ideas to benefit the firm, surely lawyers are more able to leave the monotony behind and engage with the higher-end work that really matters to the business.
That's the promise anyway, but is it reality?
Unfortunately, many signs suggest this is not the case, and this is negatively impacting lawyers' mental health.
While legal technology's thousand-mile-an-hour expansion has opened theoretical opportunities for lawyers flex their creativity, the cultural change is still missing. Lawyers used to feel pressure to stay late into the night with their paperwork. Now, while that pressure is much less common, they are instead expected to stay tuned-in 24/7 to clients' demands.
Put simply, because they can be logged on anywhere, they must always be logged on.
Obviously, this can be taxing. First and foremost, lawyers are advisers and sounding boards for their clients' concerns. Paramount to any lawyer's success is devising and delivering a measured, strategic response in high-pressure situations. Piling the best and brightest associates under the demand to subscribe to an "always switched-on" culture runs the risk of encouraging them to rush, and burn out.
Not being allowed time to react with skill instead of speed, these lawyers will be increasingly unable to stand out at their firms. Their careers may stall, and they may develop stress and mental health issues.
The stakes are high. And the more we let technology run away from us without managing cultural change, the more we alienate new associates and discourage them from growing into their roles.
So what is the solution? Increased and widespread education can go a long way. While as an industry we are getting a better grip on the issue, long-established business practices—like employee training—often have not changed in-step with technology. Law firms are leaving associates ill-equipped to handle a world that never turns off. That means associates are often anxious and overwhelmed by the task of getting up to speed in their legal career.
Central to all of this is the need for companies to understand what "digital training" means before they offer it. It does not mean teaching your employees how to use a new tool, nor is it about adding technology into a centuries-old skill set, such as drafting contracts. Instead, it means teaching lawyers that the world is moving too quickly for old-style client deliverables to keep up.
Proper training teaches lawyers how to feel comfortable and competent in the new world. The more confident they feel, the less stressed they will be and the more likely it is that they will fulfill their potential.
Regardless of how tech-savvy you might think your new associates are, they still need this training and onboarding—an introduction to exactly how technology is disrupting the world of law. Without it, you risk withholding from them of the tools they need to become an effective and efficient legal practitioner.
Dan Reed is the CEO of UnitedLex, which leads large-scale business transformation projects for global companies. Prior to this, Dan worked as general counsel and CFO to a number of public and private equity-backed companies.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Avantia Publicly Announces Agentic AI Platform Ava
- 2Shifting Sands: May a Court Properly Order the Sale of the Marital Residence During a Divorce’s Pendency?
- 3Joint Custody Awards in New York – The Current Rule
- 4Paul Hastings, Recruiting From Davis Polk, Continues Finance Practice Build
- 5Chancery: Common Stock Worthless in 'Jacobson v. Akademos' and Transaction Was Entirely Fair
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250