Three Benefits to Using the NIST Security Framework as an IT Foundation
The NIST Cybersecurity Framework provides a structure for managing data security today, as well as a roadmap for improving data security in the future with ongoing development, alignment and collaboration between industry and government.
September 05, 2019 at 07:00 AM
5 minute read
The treasure trove of valuable client data residing inside of law firms—such as financial information related to potential corporate transactions and confidential litigation documents or trade secrets—has made law firms top-priority targets of cyber criminals. Indeed, nearly one in four firms reported they have been the victim of a data breach, according to the ABA's 2018 Legal Technology Survey Report.
Law firms have responded to this challenge by making substantial investments in information security systems, technologies and procedures. Part of this response has been the search for the optimal IT framework, a mission complicated by the seemingly endless array of ISO, SOC and COBIT standards we read about frequently in the legal technology space.
As we consult with U.S. law firms, we urge them that the superior approach is to build their IT security framework on the structure laid out in the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Cybersecurity Framework.
NIST is a division of the U.S. Commerce Department that promotes U.S. innovation and industrial competitiveness by advancing measurement science, standards and technology in ways that enhance economic security. One of NIST's key strategic initiatives has been the development of a framework of controls, guidelines and best practices to help organizations manage cybersecurity-related risk.
The NIST Cybersecurity Framework provides a structure for managing data security today, as well as a roadmap for improving data security in the future with ongoing development, alignment and collaboration between industry and government. The approach laid out in the NIST framework establishes controls for organizations to implement in their IT systems and processes, ranging from how to identify known cybersecurity risks and detect the occurrence of a potential breach to how to respond to a cyber security incident and restore any organizational capabilities that were impaired.
There are a number of reasons why law firms should consider building their IT framework on the NIST framework, but here are three specific benefits that this strategic decision can deliver to a firm:
1. Creates a Security Playbook
Following the NIST framework will lead to the creation of a "System Security Plan" that law firms can use to operationalize their IT security strategy. This security playbook creates a continuous cycle for security: design; implement; review; update; and then resume the cycle again. Firms should evaluate their information security activities, align their IT budget, implement necessary IT controls, update all relevant documentation and then conduct a comprehensive review at least annually.
2. Provides Risk Assessment
The NIST framework also functions as a built-in risk assessment exercise, helping law firms go through the process of documenting which controls they have in place—and which ones are not as mature—so they can identify areas within their security program that need additional attention. This gap analysis guides the firm's IT planning by serving as a tool for framing and directing where the firm's security framework should evolve in response to changing conditions, threats and needs. Firms can leverage these insights to identify potential weaknesses in their systems and determine where budget is best allocated to mitigate the most risk.
3. Supports Responses to Audits
Roughly one-half of law firms were subjected to a cybersecurity audit last year, according to a presentation from the Association of Legal Administrators. The NIST framework provides a structure to use in organizing important descriptions, data maps and information security processes that are commonly requested in security and compliance questionnaires sent by clients. Maintaining documented structure for the law firm's data protection framework and information security program assists in providing structured and consistent responses related to client compliance. This creates a professional reporting format to provide comfort and assurance around clients' security concerns.
The NIST Cybersecurity Framework provides a comprehensive information security approach that addresses the technical bases of concern to firm stakeholders and clients, delivers law firms with an operational playbook for the protection of their IT systems, and provides an important management tool to support a firm's information security operations. In a world where the alphabet soup of compliance standards seems to grow by the day, the NIST Cybersecurity Framework is a wise foundation for any law firm's approach to information security.
Ken Kulawiak is Vice President of Information Security and Technology for HBR Consulting. Ken provides guidance on the security strategies implemented for HBR Managed Services clients, as well as HBR Consulting's approach to information governance, information security, data privacy and technology. Prior to joining HBR, he served as a Chief Information Security Officer and led the Information Governance and Risk teams for financial institutions. For more information, please go to www.hbrconsulting.com.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250