Smarter IT Means Taking a Smarter Sourcing Approach
Smartsourcing allows firms to invest in resources that keep high-value IT work in-house, while outsourcing commodity work without losing governance or control over it.
September 10, 2019 at 07:00 AM
5 minute read
Nearly every day we learn of new advancements in the areas of artificial intelligence, data science, automation and much more. For all the attention on modern technology and innovation, IT departments in firms of all sizes continue struggling to implement solutions that will move their firms forward. Many are caught between the costly and often inefficient option of keeping all IT functions in-house and the option of outsourcing all those functions which, in some cases, may result in the loss of internal knowledge, control and governance as well as the degradation of the user experience and a decline in morale among staff.
Forward-thinking CIOs at progressive law firms are addressing these challenges by pursuing a smarter approach to managing their IT departments. But what is preventing other firms from doing the same?
Many firms remain uninformed about all their options for sourcing IT work, still under the false assumption they have only an all-or-none binary choice between keeping everything in-house or outsourcing it all. Even among those aware that there are more possibilities, challenges remain related to anticipated cultural issues, fear of job loss, legacy IT debt or a lack of the leadership required to pursue a change. These are common obstacles, but all that may be overcome to allow a firm to adopt a smarter approach to IT.
|A Better Approach: Smartsourcing
Smartsourcing is a hybrid solution to the traditional choice between keeping IT functions in-house or outsourcing them all. It allows firms to invest in resources that keep high-value IT work in-house, while outsourcing commodity work without losing governance or control over it.
Smartsourcing involves using an external platform to perform commodity work that IT departments currently deal with, which provides a better user experience for employees. The idea is to take the trivial tasks that are overburdening firm staff and delegate them to the platform for third-party providers, allowing internal people to focus their time and energy on high-value work.
There are several benefits to smartsourcing that reduce the downsides of traditional outsourcing. Most important, smartsourcing is not about headcount reduction. Unlike with traditional outsourcing that results in trimming staff when work is sent outside, smartsourcing allows you to keep your current staff. They simply focus on more critical work, using the knowledge and skills they've cultivated over time. It's not the high-value work that's being outsourced.
What smartsourcing does is delegate the commodity work that often prevents in-house IT staff from pursuing innovative projects. Because that work is outsourced to a platform, you don't lose control or governance over it like you typically do when outsourcing. Instead, the commodity functions are performed by outside parties, but remain under the guidance and management of the firm.
Another key benefit of smartsourcing your commodity work while retaining your higher-value work is that you prevent employee burnout and promote improved work-life balance.
Whether your IT department has three or 50 people, they're constantly being asked to do more with less. Not only are they overburdened with operational tasks and details, they're also expected to stay on top of compliance with outside counsel guidelines and create innovative new technologies to keep clients happy. When all these tasks are viewed as equal priorities, the only realistic outcome is employee burnout, which has become increasingly prevalent in legal IT departments.
Preventing employee burnout is especially important for law firm IT departments, for which the pool of available resources remains shallow. Firms often struggle to attract the necessary talent both to keep their basic IT infrastructure operating and to deliver the innovative solutions required by lawyers to stay competitive. So, when they secure that talent, it is important they find ways to retain them.
Firms that smartsource their operational burdens tend to have greater success avoiding IT staff burnout and get better outcomes on the high-value work necessary to run their firms.
Smartsourcing also leads to cost savings. Chances are, your IT staff are currently employing dozens of different tools to handle all their tasks. By smartsourcing to a platform, you centralize everything in one tool, eliminating not only the logistics and confusion of juggling an arsenal of technology, but also the costs of maintaining each of those numerous tools.
The combination of a lack of qualified talent and increased client demands has created a perfect storm that has left law firm IT departments struggling to do more with less and facing a serious risk of burnout. Under present conditions, firms are poised to see an exodus of talented IT professionals. Smartsourcing is critical to preventing that.
By strategically outsourcing certain tasks but retaining governance and control, you can keep your team engaged and not lose critical knowledge base, all while making your clients happy and keeping the lights on for the foreseeable future.
Arup Das is CEO of Alphaserve Technologies. He is an expert in institutional-level technology governance and operational risk management standards that are prevalent in hedge funds, private equity funds, venture capital funds and global law firms. Das regularly writes and speaks for legal and other audiences on topics related to digital transformation.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250