FTC's YouTube Settlement Another Sign of COPPA Enforcement Heating Up
The Google-FTC settlement is the first COPPA settlement involving a third-party platform and behavioral advertising. Google was also hit with the largest COPPA fine ever.
September 11, 2019 at 11:30 AM
3 minute read
Collecting children's data for marketing purposes isn't completely restricted in the U.S., but the fiscal risks of doing so have increased significantly after Google settled with the FTC and New York Attorney General's Office for $170 million over YouTube's COPPA Rule violations.
In response, YouTube declared it will no longer show personalized ads on videos made for children. Starting in roughly four months, YouTube said it will treat data from anyone watching children's content on YouTube as coming from a child, meaning it will limit data collection on child-targeting videos to what is needed to "support the operation of the service."
The settlement, the stiffest fine in COPPA's history, may be another sign of the FTC becoming more assertive in protecting children's data. The settlement arrives six years after the FTC updated its COPPA Rule requiring parental consent when collecting underage children's data for behavioral advertisements and deeming third parties liable if they have "actual knowledge" that it's collecting personal information from users of a child-directed site or service.
"This is the first FTC settlement that dealt with behavioral advertisements against a platform that just hosts third-party content," said Lindsey Tonsager, a Covington & Burling partner.
And with a $170 million judgment, its price tag sticks out as the largest penalty under COPPA. Still, lawyers note the settlement doesn't change COPPA's data collection requirements.
"If you continue with behavioral advertising, you would have to serve the parents with notice and seek their affirmative consent before engaging in behavioral advertisements," said Phyllis Marcus, a Hunton Andrews Kurth partner and former FTC division of advertising practices chief of staff.
Although Google's settlement doesn't represent a sea change in what companies are allowed to do with children's data, Tonsager said the order sent a "warning message" to third-party partners. In FTC chairman Joseph Simons' separate statement, he noted the settlement included a first impression application of COPPA where a third-party platform that has actual knowledge it's collecting personal information from users of a child-directed site is liable under COPPA.
Marcus said third parties may adjust what type of information they obtain to avoid that liability. "They may look at what information they are collecting on kid-related properties and maybe tighten up some of the criteria," she said.
Along with extending COPPA liability to third parties, the FTC chairman also noted the complaint alleges channels on a general audience platform are websites or online services under COPPA, another first impression application of the law.
Aside from the recent settlement, the FTC is also stressing enforcing children's data privacy by reminding state attorneys offices that they too have the power to bring child data privacy litigation. Tonsager noted FTC Commissioner Rebecca Kelly Slaughter's statement "really encouraged state attorneys to continue bringing COPPA suits as the state attorney alone when the FTC couldn't get relief."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250