Pactum's AI Negotiator Wants to Make You an Offer You Can't Refuse
Pactum dropped a new AI-powered negotiation tool on Wednesday designed to both eliminate some of the human drama that can stall renegotiations and free up company personnel to focus on the next big deal.
September 12, 2019 at 10:05 AM
4 minute read
Pactum, a startup backed by the founders of Skype and TransferWise, released its first self-named tool on Wednesday. The solution puts artificial intelligence (AI) squarely in the pilot seat of vendor and service contract renegotiations, joining the pantheon of solutions attempting to put a dent in some of the agreement-related tasks log-jamming corporate to-do lists.
Martin Rand, Pactum's CEO, seems confident that the solution's data-driven approach to negotiations is enough to separate it from players on the field that tend to operate in more of a third-party intermediary capacity, requiring both sides to submit their negotiation preferences.
"But this is not optimal because it requires a lot of trust in the third party mediator system. What we do is actually [we] don't need the other party to enter any of their preferences. We negotiate as a normal human would," Rand said.
What it is: Pactum is a tool that brandishes AI in the hopes of helping corporate entities manage the bundles of contracts and agreements taking up space on their servers, only this time the focus is negotiating terms. The tool focuses primarily on basic vendor or service contracts.
"We built a system that can massively negotiate and renegotiate contract terms. And the opportunity that we saw is the whole world's economy is running on negotiations," Rand said.
And those negotiations run on conditions. Pactum can automatically renegotiate terms surrounding prices, payment schedules, penalties or something as specific as weekend rates. The overarching goal is for the end result to be favorable to both parties—or at least something they are willing to sign off upon.
"The system knows how to identify the priorities of [the client]," Rand said.
Under the Hood: The tool is AI-based and therefore relies on data to establish what Rand refers to as the "value function"—or what clients might simply consider to be their negotiation priorities.
The data the tool uses to understand what such priorities are flows from a variety of sources, including a company's contract management system or interviews with the client.
"We talk [to the client] about different trade-offs, about what they would value and why," Rand said.
As for the vendor a client is negotiating with, they receive an email with a link to a chat function that reviews existing contract terms, explains the client's priorities with regards to a renegotiation and proposes different trade-offs in the aim of finalizing a deal.
Like other AI solutions, Rand said the tool will continue to grow smarter over time.
"We are [gathering] data on how people negotiate, how they perceive different trade-offs and different ways of wording propositions and so-on," Rand said.
Why it's Necessary: Among the simplest explanations that Rand offers is that some companies are growing too quickly to keep up with the number of deals in their pipeline that are in need of renegotiation. Time is a factor, and in Rand's experience, people don't always use it wisely.
"I saw how difficult some of these negotiations were due to cultural differences, due to human biases, due to lack of preparation before a meeting, and this creates unoptimal terms," Rand said.
However, time isn't the only resource that can be drained during the negotiations process. Basic vendor or service contract renegotiations can also rob other, more complex agreements of much needed human attention.
"[The tool] frees those people up for more important deals. So people are needed. We're not claiming that we'll start negotiating M&A deals or really big and complicated commercial contracts," Rand said.
The Competition: Pactum isn't the first company to address the glut of contracts flowing through organizations or even to apply a level of automation to the contract and agreement market.
Contract provider Clause, for example, allows users to build contracts with conditions that are automatically executed upon signature. Wolters Kluwer has also bolstered its contract management offerings, acquiring both CLM Matrix and Legisway within the last 11 months.
Still, Rand doesn't believe that there are many direct competitors to Pactum.
"Most of the competitors right now are legal tech companies, but they're mostly either focused on putting the contract together or negotiating as a mediator," Rand said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Lawyers: Meet Your New Partner
- 2What Will It Mean in California if New Federal Anti-SLAPP Legislation Passes?
- 3Longtime AOC Director Glenn Grant to Step Down, Assignment Judge to Take Over
- 4Elon Musk’s Tesla Pay Case Stokes Chatter Between Lawyers and Clients
- 5Courts Demonstrate Growing Willingness to Sanction Courtroom Misuse of AI
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250