Inventus Launches Zenith, Bringing E-Discovery Experience to Small Matters
With its new offering, Inventus looks to highlight how e-discovery technology can be used for matters with a lower profile but still tied to significant risk.
September 17, 2019 at 09:30 AM
3 minute read
Deploying an e-discovery platform for anything other than a large investigation or litigation can be seen by some like buying a Mercedes to go to the supermarket: Sure, you got to where you needed to, but did you need to use an expensive tool to do so?
It's a question that directed the design of a new fixed-price e-discovery platform called Zenith, by management provider Inventus .
"We wanted to address what seemed to be a delineation of a simple-to-use, less high-price, self-service access to an e-discovery platform and what one would get if it were paying for a premium service," said Inventus CEO Paul Mankoo.
What it is: Zenith is an e-discovery platform that allows for "drag-and-drop discovery", which Mankoo described as a self-service allowing one to drag files from a desktop or server into Zenith and examine the resulting e-discovery analysis in the platform's dashboard.
If the data or investigation becomes too unwieldy, Zenith users can contact Inventus' project management team to help manage the project. Zenith clients can also request to move their project to a non-Zenith platform and continue to use Inventus' assistance throughout the discovery matter.
Target Audience: Although Zenith is geared toward streamlining small discovery matters, the product's target audience isn't small law firms or corporate legal departments, Mankoo noted.
"[It's] not targeted necessarily at your smaller or mid-tier law firms or smaller companies," he explained. "It's more targeted on the companies and law firms that are of a size where they do experience these large projects but don't have a solution for the smaller day-to-day matters they experience."
Mankoo said Zenith is intended for projects like internal investigations, data subject access request and other matters that could lead to significant risk if not managed properly but "maybe don't have a ton of data initially or are considered low volume in terms of dollar and cents."
The competition: The e-discovery market is rife with companies that describe their platforms as easy to use and ready out of the box, like DISCO and Everlaw, Mankoo acknowledged. But Mankoo said Zenith differs because users also have access to Inventus's experience streamlining and managing complex discovery projects as well.
"The difference is you are getting the accessibility, availability and lower price point you expect from a software company," he explained.
To be sure, there are other long-established companies that offer e-discovery consulting services, such as FTI Technology. But Mankoo argued that with these companies, e-discovery technology and consulting services are usually purchased separately instead of paired together like Zenith.
"[The other platforms] give you a slimmed down version of that platform, if you want the full functionally you have to enter into a new contract, and that's more akin to standard e-discovery."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250