Inventus Launches Zenith, Bringing E-Discovery Experience to Small Matters
With its new offering, Inventus looks to highlight how e-discovery technology can be used for matters with a lower profile but still tied to significant risk.
September 17, 2019 at 09:30 AM
3 minute read
Deploying an e-discovery platform for anything other than a large investigation or litigation can be seen by some like buying a Mercedes to go to the supermarket: Sure, you got to where you needed to, but did you need to use an expensive tool to do so?
It's a question that directed the design of a new fixed-price e-discovery platform called Zenith, by management provider Inventus .
"We wanted to address what seemed to be a delineation of a simple-to-use, less high-price, self-service access to an e-discovery platform and what one would get if it were paying for a premium service," said Inventus CEO Paul Mankoo.
What it is: Zenith is an e-discovery platform that allows for "drag-and-drop discovery", which Mankoo described as a self-service allowing one to drag files from a desktop or server into Zenith and examine the resulting e-discovery analysis in the platform's dashboard.
If the data or investigation becomes too unwieldy, Zenith users can contact Inventus' project management team to help manage the project. Zenith clients can also request to move their project to a non-Zenith platform and continue to use Inventus' assistance throughout the discovery matter.
Target Audience: Although Zenith is geared toward streamlining small discovery matters, the product's target audience isn't small law firms or corporate legal departments, Mankoo noted.
"[It's] not targeted necessarily at your smaller or mid-tier law firms or smaller companies," he explained. "It's more targeted on the companies and law firms that are of a size where they do experience these large projects but don't have a solution for the smaller day-to-day matters they experience."
Mankoo said Zenith is intended for projects like internal investigations, data subject access request and other matters that could lead to significant risk if not managed properly but "maybe don't have a ton of data initially or are considered low volume in terms of dollar and cents."
The competition: The e-discovery market is rife with companies that describe their platforms as easy to use and ready out of the box, like DISCO and Everlaw, Mankoo acknowledged. But Mankoo said Zenith differs because users also have access to Inventus's experience streamlining and managing complex discovery projects as well.
"The difference is you are getting the accessibility, availability and lower price point you expect from a software company," he explained.
To be sure, there are other long-established companies that offer e-discovery consulting services, such as FTI Technology. But Mankoo argued that with these companies, e-discovery technology and consulting services are usually purchased separately instead of paired together like Zenith.
"[The other platforms] give you a slimmed down version of that platform, if you want the full functionally you have to enter into a new contract, and that's more akin to standard e-discovery."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250