Building a CCPA Tech Solution Costs Money—But There's Another Way
Partnerships with security or tech companies may be a viable alternative for firms who don't have the resources to become tech developers themselves.
September 24, 2019 at 11:15 AM
3 minute read
The California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) doesn't officially touch down until January 1, 2020, but law firms have long since begun offering internally-built compliance apps geared towards helping client's transition into full compliance. But could there be a better—or at least cheaper—way?
Kaufman Dolowich & Voluck thinks so. Last week, the firm announced that it had entered into a partnership with the secure systems and solutions provider EC Wise to provide hands-on assistance to clients who still need help before they can claim mastery of the CCPA. The firm will handle legal issues related to policies or vendor contracts, while EC Wise will fill in the gaps around data security and deletion.
Katherine Catlos, a partner at Kaufman Dolowich & Voluck, stressed that the technical experience EC Wise brought to the table when it came to helping companies secure data was not something that was not necessarily in deep supply at the firm.
"I think other law firms probably have tech inside, in-house, that can assist with these sort of things, but our firm doesn't and so it seemed like it was the right thing to do," Catlos said.
To be sure, Kaufman Dolowich & Voluck isn't alone in looking for an alternative to building tech in-house.
Tomu Johnson, an attorney with Parsons Behle & Latimer and CEO of its subsidiary, Parsons Behle Lab, noted that while many firms are increasingly examining the option of producing their own tech, the expenditure of resources needed to successfully assemble a team and bring a product to market can be a splash of cold water.
"I think that the costs are largely out of reach for most law firms," Johnson said.
Partnerships in the vain of EC Wise and Kaufman Dolowich & Voluck circumvent such a hefty investment because there isn't a "product" or a technological framework that needs to be built first in order to facilitate the service. This is also something that may better suit the needs of the middle-market companies the partnership is looking to address, many of whom may be at the beginning of their compliance journeys and require more hands-on services now that the CCPA is only a little more than 3-months out.
Per Catlos, many of the people that Kaufman Dolowich & Voluck speaks with are still largely unfamiliar with the regulation, possibly because they don't think it will apply to them.
"I think that what's helpful in having a company that's familiar with privacy and security is taking the steps to make sure that the data is secure and that the appropriate patches are there and following the data lifecycle," Catlos said.
Parsons Behle & Latimer's Johnson agreed, adding that he believes that such partnerships will provide a viable alternative to firms unable to produce their own tech, and expects to see more of them moving forward.
However, he said that doesn't preclude a spot in the ecosystem for law firm-produced apps like Parson's own CCPA IQ, which uses a series of questions to help customers generate compliance-related documents. In that instance, paying a law firm to perform those tasks on an on-going basis might be more costly than the one-time investment of the app.
"[Law firm] service hours are going to be much more structured than they would be without the app in the first place," Johnson said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250