Case of Attorney's E-Filing Fail Won't Go to New Jersey High Court
The New Jersey Supreme Court won't take up the case of a defense attorney who failed to file electronically and pay the $200 filing fee in his client's action seeking to challenge a $200,000 arbitration award to an injured gym patron.
September 25, 2019 at 11:46 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New Jersey Law Journal
The New Jersey Supreme Court has denied a petition for certification in a case involving a woman whose $200,000 arbitration award for falling in a gym wasn't challenged in court after the club's defense attorney failed to file electronically the demand for a trial de novo or pay the $200 filing fee.
In Cuomo v. NY Sports Club, the Appellate Division decided NY Sports Club couldn't challenge a $200,000 arbitration award to plaintiff Helena Cuomo. Cuomo sued the company after tripping over an exercise bench at one of its clubs and sustaining fractures to her left wrist and elbow, torn cartilage on her left knee and herniated discs in her spine, she claimed.
The Supreme Court denied a petition for certification in the case in an order dated Sept. 20.
In the Appellate Division's per curiam decision last May, Judges Marie Simonelli and Lisa Firko upheld the award against the health club after its counsel, Eric Evans of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani in Florham Park, missed the March 2, 2018, deadline on filing for a trial de novo and paying the $200 fee. An office secretary also failed to follow proper filing procedures, said the panel.
A lower court gave Evans notice of his failure to comply with mandatory eCourts filing and payment requirements with sufficient time to contact the court and ascertain the proper filing procedure, the appeals court said. But Evans failed to do so and never explained why, the court said.
The court sent all parties a deficiency notice stating that the payment was missing two days after his secretary's error. It wasn't until 17 days after the deadline to e-file that Evans claimed he became aware the court had not cashed the $200 check, the decision said.
On April 13, 2018, Superior Court Judge Christine Farrington filed orders confirming the arbitration award and denying the defendant's motion for leave to file a trial de novo demand.
The Appellate Division rejected claims by Evans and Peter Siachos of Gordon Rees that their client never received specific notice that the payment was nonconforming. The panel also rejected Evans' claim that the firm substantially complied with the court rule concerning a request for trial de novo after arbitration.
The 30-day deadline for filing a timely trial de novo demand can be relaxed under the substantial compliance doctrine, but in the present case there was a failure to file, not a failure to serve, Simonelli and Firko said in upholding the $200,000 award to Cuomo.
Evans declined to comment, and Siachos couldn't be reached.
Suzanne Smith of Cillick & Smith in Hackensack, who represented Cuomo, also couldn't be reached.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1New York Judge Steps Down After Conviction for Intoxicated Driving
- 2Keys to Maximizing Efficiency (and Vibes) When Navigating International Trade Compliance Crosschecks
- 3Houston Law Firm Files $250K Breach of Contract Suit Against 2 Former Lawyers
- 4The Week in Data Feb. 3: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
- 5Mass Tort Cases: Challenges for Plaintiff’s and Defense Counsel
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250