Uncertainty May Keep Legal Operations Out of Small to Midsize Legal Departments
Only 23% of those in small to midsize legal departments said they believed their legal departments would benefit by hiring a legal operations professional, according to a report by Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory and Priori.
September 30, 2019 at 01:00 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
Only 23% of those in small to midsize legal departments said they believed their legal departments would benefit by hiring a legal operations professional, which shows lingering uncertainty about legal operations, according to a report by Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory and Priori published this week.
The respondents included 176 members of the Association of Corporate Counsel. Eighty-eight percent of respondents were based in the United States.
"The general theme overall is uncertainty," Brian Kudowitz, a portfolio director at Wolters Kluwer, said Friday.
Kudowitz said the beginning of a legal operations function should be with data that will show business leaders where efficiencies can be achieved.
"You have to make a case, at the end of the day, of what the priority is," Kudowitz explained. "Most of the resistance in getting this started comes from looking like you're trying to bite off too much."
He said legal departments hoping to implement legal operations should focus on one thing first and show the business where it is going to get a return on the investment in legal operations or legal technology.
However, one of the issues for smaller and midsize legal departments, said Basha Rubin, CEO and co-founder of Priori, is they do not know which data they have or how to utilize it.
"I think that many smaller legal departments are operating in the dark about what their data is," Rubin said.
Legal departments can often get caught up in the allure of new technology without fully understanding it. Kudowitz said those attorneys who may be buying legal technology should do due diligence and make sure it is the right fit for their goals.
"I think you have to take the tough customer approach to make sure your vendors understand your needs and to make sure [the technology] is being implemented the right way," Kudowitz said.
Rubin said she knew of someone who spent the majority of the day undoing an artificial intelligence contract because that person could not use it.
"The boss had met the company's founders at a conference and they hadn't done a deep dive on the product," Rubin said. "They put this tool in place during a legal operations push and that caused a lot of blowback."
The report shows that 59% of respondents have some kind of legal operations function within their legal department. Rubin and Kudowitz said this is a good sign for the future of legal operations in small to midsize legal departments.
"I think [there will be] more smaller legal departments who are bringing on legal operations functions," Rubin said.
"In the next couple of years, some of these [legal operations] people will move around which will create a cross-pollination effect," Kudowitz said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1De-Mystifying the Ethics of the Attorney Transition Process, Part 2
- 2Being a Profession is Not Malarkey
- 3Bring NJ's 'Pretrial Opportunity Program' into the Open
- 4High-Speed Crash With Police Vehicle Nets $1.6 Million Settlement
- 5Embracing a ‘Stronger Together’ Mentality: Collaboration Best Practices for Attorneys
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250