Big Tech for Small Businesses: How UK Challenge Wants to Close Legal Gaps
Eight finalists won £50,000 ($61,500) in the first Solicitors Regulation Authority-Nesta Legal Access Challenge, including four legal tech platforms targeting small businesses' legal woes.
October 01, 2019 at 01:00 PM
5 minute read
The goal of access-to-justice platforms is noble: Create sound legal solutions for people who wouldn't otherwise have the wherewithal to obtain legal advice. But placing those products in the hands of its intended clients can be difficult.
The U.K.'s Solicitors Regulation Authority and innovation foundation Nesta Challenges seek to change that after they announced the eight finalists of their first Legal Access Challenge, a few of which assist small businesses with their legal matters.
The eight finalists were awarded £50,000 ($61,500) and guidance from the SRA, the regulatory body for the solicitors profession in the U.K., to develop products that address small business and individual legal needs.
Chris Gorst, head of Nesta's better markets team, said legal technology isn't generally created with small businesses' needs in mind.
He noted that this is part of a broader shortfall. "We are seeing a lot of investment in innovation, particularly digital innovation with the big law firms, huge investments in AI and machine learning, but you aren't seeing very much penetration of tech-enabled legal services for the broader market of citizens and small businesses."
Below are the four small business-specific legal tech tools that were named as finalists in this year's challenge. While they address different needs, they all seek to improve the legal difficulties faced by small businesses.
Litigation Friend
For Tara Grossman, the idea behind challenge finalist Litigation Friend and its parent company Solomonic was the question all lawyers are asked by clients: Will I win my case?
Grossman, who worked at Herbert Smith Freehills as a solicitor and in-house at Airbnb and Goldman Sachs, said a solicitor's answer to predicting a case's outcome is a mix of "gut feeling" based on previous experience and consulting other solicitors.
Litigation Friend and Solomonic are geared toward taking the guesswork out of predicting a case's success rate. Litigation Friend is a platform for settling employment tribunal claims between small and midsize businesses and individuals to "get to a place where you can settle quickly and avoid the stress of litigation," Grossman said. Using Solomonic's case analysis ability and artificial intelligence, Litigation Friend users can predict their matter's projected damages award, how long it would take for the court to issue a judgment and their likelihood to win.
Grossman said the team will use the partnerships and prize money to enhance its AI and analytics ability to analyze thousands of employment tribunal judgments.
Glow
Glow by Duo Ventures seeks to unite multiple claimants and simplify the creation of collective redress cases, said Duo Ventures co-founder Amar Chauhan.
"For a law firm or multiple law firms to manage a large amount of claimants is currently an administrative nightmare, we are simplifying the process for everyone involved," Chauhan said.
Glow seeks to streamline collective redress and reduce the time solicitors spend on administrative tasks so they can hopefully pass on the saving to clients. Solicitors "can save time and money, enabling a higher turnover of cases, which will increase deal flow," he explained.
TakeNote
After harassment complaints were lodged at British fashion retailer Ted Baker and its former CEO, Organise CEO Nat Whalley said multiple focus groups revealed employees wanted a discreet way to document workplace harassment.
TakeNote was created to allow employees to document any workplace interaction that seemed inappropriate. She explained those actions include direct acts of discrimination and "all of those things that happens on their own that doesn't seem like a big deal but over a course of several months is significant."
Whalley, who has a background as an organizer and campaign manager, said the notes can be sent as a PDF to a lawyer or union rep to discuss further legal or employment action. With the cash prize, her team is exploring encryption possibilities, identifying any legal pitfalls to sharing sensitive information through a cellphone and establishing partnerships with industries that face high rates of harassment. Whalley noted those partnerships are important to keep TakeNote free and sustainable for anyone to use to document workplace harassment.
Resolve Disputes Online
Resolve Disputes Online is a dispute resolution tech provider that develops online negotiations and mediation tools for U.K. consumers and businesses. Co-founder and lawyer Joe Al-Khayat noted in a press release announcing the finalists that Resolve Disputes Online is already being leveraged in multiple countries.
"We are very much aligned to the U.N.'s sustainability goal to improve global access to justice and already we provide our technology to governments and private mediation centers in jurisdictions such [as] the USA, Canada, Singapore, Thailand and Australia," he explained. "As a team of U.K. lawyers, we are thrilled to be able to help our home jurisdiction innovate and ease the pain points of disputes for consumers and businesses in England and Wales."
The Rest of the Competition
The other nonbusiness legal tools named as finalists include Formily, a tool for divorce proceedings, digital rights "one-stop-shop" MyDigitalRights, RCJ Advice, which offers women and children legal aid, and Mencap, a chatbot that helps people with learning disabilities maneuver community care and welfare benefits.
Two winners are scheduled to be announced in March 2020 and they will receive an additional £50,000.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250