National Docketing Association Conference Takes on Risk and Evolving Tech
Last week's NDA Conference focused on the 'force multipliers' of docketing professionals, covering some key areas of technology adoption, risk and change management.
October 02, 2019 at 07:00 AM
5 minute read
The Annual National Docketing Association (NDA) Conference held last week in Denver—the group's most well-attended event since its inception eight years ago—drew 200 attendees who gathered to learn about best practices in technology and see first hand some of the innovation taking place in this sector. With 962 active members (and 172 added just since last year), the NDA is made up of seven chapters nationally, and the group has sponsored over 50 events in 2019 so far including cyber socials, networking events, and education via monthly webinars.
The conference focus is to educate professionals in the latest best practices in technology, training, case management and policy and procedure to assist them in performing their jobs. This year's event covered some key areas of technology adoption including risk and change management. And from conference feedback, this growth could continue and the much overlooked but important aspect of the legal process continue to gain traction.
Here's what we learned.
Aaron Lukken, this year's keynote speaker, underscored the value of docketing professionals who are a necessary but often overlooked component in the litigation process. As the "chief sherpa" at Viking Advocates, Lukken works with a network of attorneys and agents to assist lawyers and law firms across North America navigate cross-border litigation.
"They make us all better at what we do," Lukken said. "Docketing pros are 'force multipliers.' Think of litigators as the leader of a mountain-climbing expedition and the sherpa are who get the expedition leaders to the top of the mountain."
In his session, "Developing a Docketing Policy," Randy Curato, vice president, senior loss prevention counsel, at ALAS, Inc., a risk retention group that insures lawyers in the U.S. and abroad, discussed the importance of missed deadlines.
"Missed deadlines are the leading cause of malpractice suits," said Curato. "The very definition of docketing is that it's a system for lawyers and law firms to verify, record, remind responsible lawyers of, and comply with, upcoming deadlines or the other dates requiring action."
He offered some "must haves" for law firms to follow when developing internal systems for docketing that would reduce risk, including centralized systems; easy-to-use UI; user inclusivity so everyone can use it; redundant calculation for setting court dates; redundant recording to assure that dates are not only set, but removed from a calendar; and ongoing reminders.
Curato also emphasized that the full process needs to be written down or accounted for in a way that everyone can participate. Implementing a new policy isn't something that one individual should be trusted with. Data from a pre-show survey found that only 51 percent of all law firms have a written policy.
A transparent process allows teams to not just meet the process, but also beat the process for added time in the event of error, he added. "If the docketing policy isn't written down, it's probably not getting done properly."
In the session "Motivating Change" session, Tara Kim Eberhart, director of paralegal service and docketing at Dentons US, discussed change management. She said to stimulate change in organizations, whether adopting a new workflow or new technology, or integrating with a new acquisition, it will require change management skills. Her experience in discussing this topic of change management and adopting new technology comes from overseeing the 150-plus member program in addition to the national general/litigation and intellectual property docketing teams and integrating a number of acquisitions through her firm.
"Organizations don't change, people do," said Eberhart. "It's difficult to get people to want to change, so how do we create a culture of change? Everyone has a theory, but better organizations have a process making it easier to rinse and repeat change."
In her talk, Eberhart focuses on creating and updating their docketing standard operating procedures regardless of technology, whether navigating an alliance, merger, or acquisition.
"Work hard and be nice to people when affecting change," Eberhart added. "You can't control change. You can only control your reaction to it."
Technology Innovation
We found that of the 15 vendor sponsors who were present, only American LegalNet (ALN) had a new product to announce. The new solution looks to lower both costs and time taken to file with local courts, as well as reduce the risk of a filing being rejected.
While ALN's new e-Filing Portal was the sole product announcement at the three-day event, a number of other companies there recently had seen some product additions, growth, acquisitions, and partnerships. PacerPro recently announced that its technology is now in 40 percent of the Am Law 100. LawToolBox has been working on integration with Microsoft Office 365 and some of their newer work platforms including Microsoft Teams.
In all, the education, from working like a sherpa, to managing risk through documented process, and handling change through preparation and process, along with the growing technology offerings—and the growth of the NDA itself—all point to enhanced understanding of new technology and growth finding their way into this much-needed category.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Big Law Firms Sheppard Mullin, Morgan Lewis and Baker Botts Add Partners in Houston
- 2Lack of Jurisdiction Dooms Child Sex Abuse Claim Against Archdiocese of Philadelphia, says NJ Supreme Court
- 3DC Lawsuits Seek to Prevent Mass Firings and Public Naming of FBI Agents
- 4Growth of California Firms Exceeded Expectations, Survey of Managing Partners Says
- 5Blank Rome Adds Life Sciences Trio From Reed Smith
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250