Improving DevOps May Take Pain Out of Law Firm Tech Development
Law firms are beginning to bring software developers into the fold, and as law firms' IT departments make room, tech consultants say a clear understanding of priorities and expectations are paramount for efficient workflows.
October 11, 2019 at 10:30 AM
4 minute read
More law firms are developing legal technology to assist their clients or streamline lawyers' or staffers' workload. In turn, DevOps can be key in alleviating inefficiencies or burnout during legal tech development.
DevOps, short for development and operations, is a set of practices used to quicken and automate processes to get a product out as quickly and easily as possible.
In 2018, Kelley Drye & Warren chief information officer Judith Flournoy described DevOps for law firms as designing and implementing "repeatable processes with minimal disruption that can be easily understood and reused over and over again, regardless of whether it's a Windows 10 deployment or another system."
In most industries, DevOps includes improving communication and collaboration between the IT department and other teams, and law firms are no different. Below are some tips for legal tech DevOps, from earning buy-in to making sure communication leads to advocates in different departments—a needed ally when matters go awry.
1. Gaining Buy-In
"If you have an older law firm and are transitioning that technology, change is a big issue and you have to have a lot of people to buy-in," explained Andres Hernandez, co-founder and CEO of law firm tech consultancy Wingman LegalTech. He added, "The last thing you want is implementing new technologies and the partners don't buy into it, and the IT department turns into the bad guys."
Before IT is seen as the villain, Hernandez suggested law firms hire leadership that has tech and communication skills and understands how the technology will impact the firm's overall business.
"Technology is ingrained with everything we do and they need to understand how it supports the business," he said.
2. Communication Creates Advocates
Beau Mersereau, Fish & Richardson's director of legal technology solutions, said the key for law firms creating legal technology is communication between software developers and practice groups to keep everyone aware of a project's development. Such communication creates needed advocates when issues arise and lawyers and staffers want answers.
"You are building affinity with those groups and you are trying to build partnerships, so when something goes wrong, they're there to help you. In my experience, if there's an issue, they will help you explain it to other people." He added, "While we are working on the issue, they become your advocates."
3. Address Burnout Beforehand
Jeff Gallimore, partner and co-founder of Agile technology firm Excella, lauds DevOps for not only the efficiency it provides, but also for its ability to prevent burnout, a mental health issue that grips the legal industry.
"Leaders must care about their teams and the people in their organizations. Put a little more bluntly, bosses need to give a damn. They should care about whether burnout is affecting their people," Gallimore wrote in an email.
"Once we know about it, then we can work on making it better. And in the process of making it better for our people, we will also get better results for our companies, especially in productivity."
4. Leveraging Partnerships
Hernandez also recommended law firms bring on third-parties when developing software.
"If you are not a technology company, [and] you are a law firm, your business is providing legal services, always keep that in mind." He added, "If you are expanding your department, make sure you are bringing the right leadership and leveraging the right partners, [because] bringing them in-house would be very expensive."
But for the law firms that do hire in-house developers, Hernandez said it's important to have realistic expectations about the cost and time needed to create software. "Make sure you don't cut any costs, because good developers and good support consultants cost money and does make a difference in the quality of work."
5. Acknowledging Tech's Disruption
For legal tech development to have a captivated audience in law firms, all lawyers and staffers have to understand tech's current and future impact on their work.
"Law firms should also recognize that technology has been disrupting almost every industry, and legal is not an exception," Gallimore said. "Adopting this perspective will help legal IT departments take effective steps to keep themselves updated with modern tools that help them quickly meet their client demands."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250