How Technology Will Change the Role of Lawyers: A FinTech GC's Perspective
It's not about simply "doing" legal work anymore; it's about deeply understanding the implications of the work and helping clients to walk the fine line between risk and return.
October 16, 2019 at 01:00 PM
6 minute read
This article is the first in a monthly column from FinTech GC Ksenia Sussman examining how the legal profession should adapt to current, and future, changes in technology.
In 1998, Henry Blodget, who at the time was an analyst at CIBC Oppenheimer, boldly predicted that Amazon's stock would reach $400 per share. Blodget's call was made at the height of a huge run-up in valuations of Silicon Valley tech startups. At the time, anything with a ".com" attached to it took off like a rocket ship.
A few years later, following the dot-com crash, Blodget's prediction became a cautionary tale espoused as part of the new conventional wisdom that the internet was merely another mania, a 21st-Century equivalent of the "tulip bulb" bubble. A column in the November 25, 2001 edition of The New York Times read "Dot-Com is Dot-Gone, And the Dream With It."
But dot-com, and the dreams of tech entrepreneurs, were not gone. The era of Internet 2.0, ushered in by founders like Mark Zuckerberg (Facebook), Jack Dorsey (Twitter), and Sergey Brin (Google) during the mid- to late-2000s, demonstrated that the internet was not a fad. As the last 15 years has made patently obvious, it's become integral to almost everything we do in our personal and business lives—a trend that is virtually certain to accelerate.
As is often the case, the legal industry arrived a little late to the technology party. That changed following last decade's financial crisis and the "Great Recession." These momentous events led to downward pressures on legal fees, increased demand for alternative billing practices, greater competition for fewer opportunities, and, yes, a deeper understanding (or, perhaps, resignation) that technology must play a more significant role in delivering efficient and effective legal advice.
There is more than a whiff of fear in the air about the impact of technology on legal services. Technologies such as artificial intelligence and blockchain are changing, and will continue to change, the legal industry in myriad ways. But technology will almost certainly not displace lawyers.
Some lawyers, as Deloitte predicts, will inevitably be negatively impacted. Jobs will be lost. Routine, high-volume legal tasks previously performed by highly-paid lawyers will be automated out of existence. But, as in other technological revolutions, new opportunities will emerge. No, lawyers won't go the way of early 20th-Century buggy whip makers. The lawyers of the future, however, must recognize that the jobs they're used to performing, and the expectations of their clients, are changing as a result of the emergence of legal tech.
As general counsel of a FinTech company operating at the intersection of financial services and technology, I've witnessed firsthand how technology is disrupting a traditionally conservative industry (financial services). As a consumer of legal services that support financial services, I have a front row seat to witness the evolution of the legal industry as well.
What's missing from the conversation about how technology will continue to transform the legal industry is that technology's ripples will extend well beyond things like e-discovery and AI-powered legal research. These are important tools for lawyers to use and understand, and more technology is coming online every day. In 2018, investments in legal tech exceeded $1 billion for the first time, and over $1.2 billion has already been raised by legal tech companies in 2019—with several months of fundraising left to go. Legal tech is reaching maturity and soon will achieve ubiquity across the legal landscape. Accordingly, it's time for lawyers to adapt their roles in light of this paradigm shift.
More important, however, is that lawyers appreciate how technology is impacting their clients' businesses. Every lawyer knows that one of the primary qualities that in-house counsel looks for from outside lawyers is a deep understanding of their business. That means gaining deep knowledge of a client's industry, customers or clients, products or services, as well as the technologies that are integral to the business.
What Lawyers of the Future Need to Understand
Over the coming months, I will be sharing my perspectives about what the lawyer of the future can and should be. As someone who oversees the legal function of a business that is heavily dependent on technology (what business isn't these days?), I'm not only interested in but, in fact, reliant upon, seeing lawyers step up to the challenges that technology is introducing into the practice of law.
In particular, as technology continues to automate routine tasks, lawyers will no longer be relied upon as heavily to draft contracts and review documents, but instead will be called upon to manage risks with greater sophistication and efficacy than ever before. In my industry, the most effective lawyers will understand how things like blockchain, bitcoin, digital assets, and digitized securities are changing calculations as to risk, reward, and more broadly how they are transforming the very nature of financial services.
It's not about simply "doing" legal work anymore; it's about deeply understanding the implications of the work and helping clients to walk the fine line between risk and return. To succeed in this environment, lawyers must embrace a collaborative relationship with technology, not an adversarial one. The best of the next generation will not only use advanced technology but also learn its inner-workings.
This column will not paint a Luddite, doom and gloom picture of the future of the legal profession in light of the transformational effect of technology. Rather, in it I will argue that technology will unshackle lawyers—particularly those early in their careers—from many of the routine, mind-numbing tasks that are widely despised within the industry, and free them up to tackle more creative and interesting problems. In this sense, technology offers lawyers the hope of more enriching, satisfying careers spent operating at their highest and best capabilities.
I hope you'll join me on this journey and embrace technology for the positive force it can be within the legal profession. As FinTech counsel whose job depends on finding smart lawyers who understand our business and can help us manage risk, I can tell you that, without a doubt, the pace of technological change that lawyers must confront is not slowing down. It's only accelerating. And my goal over the coming months is to impart my understanding of how lawyers can adapt so as not to be left behind.
Ksenia Sussman is general counsel at digital asset advisory firm BitOoda.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1'Ridiculously Busy': Several Law Firms Position Themselves as Go-To Experts on Trump’s Executive Orders
- 2States Reach New $7.4B Opioid Deal With Purdue After SCOTUS Ruling
- 3$975,000 Settlement Reached After Fall on Sidewalk
- 4'Where Were the Lawyers?' Judge Blocks Trump's Birthright Citizenship Order
- 5Big Law Sidelined as Asian IPOs in New York Are Dominated by Small Cap Listings
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250