How Technology Will Change the Role of Lawyers: A FinTech GC's Perspective
It's not about simply "doing" legal work anymore; it's about deeply understanding the implications of the work and helping clients to walk the fine line between risk and return.
October 16, 2019 at 01:00 PM
6 minute read
This article is the first in a monthly column from FinTech GC Ksenia Sussman examining how the legal profession should adapt to current, and future, changes in technology.
In 1998, Henry Blodget, who at the time was an analyst at CIBC Oppenheimer, boldly predicted that Amazon's stock would reach $400 per share. Blodget's call was made at the height of a huge run-up in valuations of Silicon Valley tech startups. At the time, anything with a ".com" attached to it took off like a rocket ship.
A few years later, following the dot-com crash, Blodget's prediction became a cautionary tale espoused as part of the new conventional wisdom that the internet was merely another mania, a 21st-Century equivalent of the "tulip bulb" bubble. A column in the November 25, 2001 edition of The New York Times read "Dot-Com is Dot-Gone, And the Dream With It."
But dot-com, and the dreams of tech entrepreneurs, were not gone. The era of Internet 2.0, ushered in by founders like Mark Zuckerberg (Facebook), Jack Dorsey (Twitter), and Sergey Brin (Google) during the mid- to late-2000s, demonstrated that the internet was not a fad. As the last 15 years has made patently obvious, it's become integral to almost everything we do in our personal and business lives—a trend that is virtually certain to accelerate.
As is often the case, the legal industry arrived a little late to the technology party. That changed following last decade's financial crisis and the "Great Recession." These momentous events led to downward pressures on legal fees, increased demand for alternative billing practices, greater competition for fewer opportunities, and, yes, a deeper understanding (or, perhaps, resignation) that technology must play a more significant role in delivering efficient and effective legal advice.
There is more than a whiff of fear in the air about the impact of technology on legal services. Technologies such as artificial intelligence and blockchain are changing, and will continue to change, the legal industry in myriad ways. But technology will almost certainly not displace lawyers.
Some lawyers, as Deloitte predicts, will inevitably be negatively impacted. Jobs will be lost. Routine, high-volume legal tasks previously performed by highly-paid lawyers will be automated out of existence. But, as in other technological revolutions, new opportunities will emerge. No, lawyers won't go the way of early 20th-Century buggy whip makers. The lawyers of the future, however, must recognize that the jobs they're used to performing, and the expectations of their clients, are changing as a result of the emergence of legal tech.
As general counsel of a FinTech company operating at the intersection of financial services and technology, I've witnessed firsthand how technology is disrupting a traditionally conservative industry (financial services). As a consumer of legal services that support financial services, I have a front row seat to witness the evolution of the legal industry as well.
What's missing from the conversation about how technology will continue to transform the legal industry is that technology's ripples will extend well beyond things like e-discovery and AI-powered legal research. These are important tools for lawyers to use and understand, and more technology is coming online every day. In 2018, investments in legal tech exceeded $1 billion for the first time, and over $1.2 billion has already been raised by legal tech companies in 2019—with several months of fundraising left to go. Legal tech is reaching maturity and soon will achieve ubiquity across the legal landscape. Accordingly, it's time for lawyers to adapt their roles in light of this paradigm shift.
More important, however, is that lawyers appreciate how technology is impacting their clients' businesses. Every lawyer knows that one of the primary qualities that in-house counsel looks for from outside lawyers is a deep understanding of their business. That means gaining deep knowledge of a client's industry, customers or clients, products or services, as well as the technologies that are integral to the business.
|What Lawyers of the Future Need to Understand
Over the coming months, I will be sharing my perspectives about what the lawyer of the future can and should be. As someone who oversees the legal function of a business that is heavily dependent on technology (what business isn't these days?), I'm not only interested in but, in fact, reliant upon, seeing lawyers step up to the challenges that technology is introducing into the practice of law.
In particular, as technology continues to automate routine tasks, lawyers will no longer be relied upon as heavily to draft contracts and review documents, but instead will be called upon to manage risks with greater sophistication and efficacy than ever before. In my industry, the most effective lawyers will understand how things like blockchain, bitcoin, digital assets, and digitized securities are changing calculations as to risk, reward, and more broadly how they are transforming the very nature of financial services.
It's not about simply "doing" legal work anymore; it's about deeply understanding the implications of the work and helping clients to walk the fine line between risk and return. To succeed in this environment, lawyers must embrace a collaborative relationship with technology, not an adversarial one. The best of the next generation will not only use advanced technology but also learn its inner-workings.
This column will not paint a Luddite, doom and gloom picture of the future of the legal profession in light of the transformational effect of technology. Rather, in it I will argue that technology will unshackle lawyers—particularly those early in their careers—from many of the routine, mind-numbing tasks that are widely despised within the industry, and free them up to tackle more creative and interesting problems. In this sense, technology offers lawyers the hope of more enriching, satisfying careers spent operating at their highest and best capabilities.
I hope you'll join me on this journey and embrace technology for the positive force it can be within the legal profession. As FinTech counsel whose job depends on finding smart lawyers who understand our business and can help us manage risk, I can tell you that, without a doubt, the pace of technological change that lawyers must confront is not slowing down. It's only accelerating. And my goal over the coming months is to impart my understanding of how lawyers can adapt so as not to be left behind.
Ksenia Sussman is general counsel at digital asset advisory firm BitOoda.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Litigation Leaders: Greenspoon Marder’s Beth-Ann Krimsky on What Makes Her Team ‘Prepared, Compassionate and Wicked Smart’
- 2A Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
- 3Grabbing Market Share From Rivals, Law Firms Ramped Up Group Lateral Hires
- 4Navigating Twitter's 'Rocky Deal Process' Helped Drive Simpson Thacher's Tech and Telecom Practice
- 5Public Notices/Calendars
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250