Former Catalyst CEO Launches New Open Source Push for Legal Tech
While open source software is common—you're likely reading this article on an open source browser—it's a rarity in the legal tech space. John Tredennick is hoping to change that.
October 17, 2019 at 07:00 AM
3 minute read
John Tredennick, founder and former CEO of e-discovery company Catalyst Repository Systems, has accepted the challenge of bringing free, open source legal tech to an industry notoriously known as a slow tech adopter.
After stepping down as the CEO of Catalyst in January, which followed Catalyst being acquired by OpenText for $75 million, Tredennick said he wanted to bring open source tech to the legal market. Nearly a year later, he's officially launched the Merlin Legal Open Source Foundation as its executive director.
Tredennick said the nonprofit will serve as a platform to spark collaboration among legal professionals with open source development projects. The platform will share open source software for free and provide information regarding open source software's advantages and the benefits of secure cloud computing on its website.
Tredennick, who previously founded a compliance and regulatory workflow software developer company, said the free, open source legal technology shared on his foundation will include access-to-justice software. He cited software similar to DoNotPay as an example, i.e., tools that automate simple legal services that would be too expensive if a lawyer were retained.
Additionally, the foundation will highlight legal and regulatory compliance open source tools that streamline tasks faced by most lawyers.
"The key to this relies on our mission, which is improving access to justice and regulatory compliance, [and making it] more effective because this stuff is not the core of any company's business or law firms and the fact that you do it won't make you stand out in the market," Tredennick explained.
Tredennick's remarks mirror those of Shawn Curran, head of legal technology at U.K. law firm Travers Smith and a member of the foundation's advisory board, when he explained in September why his firm made its email management software open source.
"We certainly don't see ourselves competing with other law firms on email management, so it made sense to share it," Curran told Legaltech News at the time. "We hope that many other law firms openly share projects that don't provide a competitive advantage."
Tredennick hopes more lawyers will share and leverage open source technology, but he acknowledged it is an uphill battle convincing some lawyers of open source software's safety and abilities. Still, he said lawyers are usually surprised when he informs them that the Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox and Microsoft Edge browsers they use are built on open source platforms. "In other words, they are already using it," he said.
What's more, Tredennick noted that open source software's potential cost-savings is beginning to thaw lawyers' icy reception.
"I think there's been a rise in interest among legal people saying, 'Wait a minute, this code is as good or better than the code we pay for.'"
In addition to Curran of Travers Smith, the foundation's advisory board also includes legal reporter Bob Ambrogi, Cooley tech transactions partner Adam Ruttenberg and Mary Mack, former executive director of the Association of Certified E-Discovery Specialists.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Why Kramer Levin Decided to Merge
- 2Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-61
- 3Decision of the Day: School District's Probe Was a 'Sham'; Title IX Administrator Showed Sex-Based Bias
- 4US Magistrate Judge Embry Kidd Confirmed to 11th Circuit
- 5Shaq Signs $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250