A J.D. Not Necessary in Legal Operations Leadership, Experts Say
Experts say the number of legal operations leaders who do not have law degrees is increasing, and there is little downside to having someone without a juris doctor lead the function.
October 23, 2019 at 01:00 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
Experts say the number of legal operations leaders who do not have law degrees is increasing, with little downside to having someone without a juris doctor lead the function.
"There is a recognition that legal operations do not have to be led by a lawyer. Often it is better if it is not led by a lawyer. It could be a finance professional or a technology professional or even an MBA," Robin Snasdell, managing director at Consilio, said. "It's not just lawyers that in-house legal departments need."
Mary O'Carroll, director of legal operations at Google and president of the Corporate Legal Operations Consortium, and Catherine J. Moynihan, executive director of the Association of Corporate Counsel legal operations, separately told Corporate Counsel that roughly half of legal operations leaders do not have a J.D. Neither group has done a formal study on the subject.
O'Carroll, who does not have a J.D., said in her 16 years in the profession she has not felt disadvantaged. She said of her 50-person team of legal operations professionals at Google, only one is an attorney.
"Legal ops is a multidisciplinary area that requires a strong foundation in things like financial management, project management, process improvement, change management, and at least a passion for technology," O'Carroll said in an email.
There is not a disadvantage to having a lawyer at the top of a legal operations function, Moynihan said. She said lawyers can naturally be good at finding ways to optimize legal services, although that is not in their law school training.
"Depending on the priority of the general counsel, you may be looking for a slightly different skill set," said Moynihan, who has an MBA but not a J.D.
Typically, high-ranking in-house work is given to firm attorneys who have worked as outside counsel. The skills of well-qualified firm attorneys are often better suited for creating revenue, which is a different attitude than that of in-house counsel, Snasdell said.
According to experts, there are no distinct disadvantages to having someone without a J.D. run a legal operations function. There may, however, be a perception issue.
"Having a J.D. is absolutely a bonus and often gives you more credibility and acceptance in the role with your lawyer clients, but I also think having a business or technology background allows you to bring in a new perspective and unique skill sets to the department," O'Carroll said.
It should be on the general counsel to include the head of legal operations, whether they hold a J.D. or not, on the leadership team. If the legal operations lead is part of leadership, the practice group leaders will hold them in higher regard, Moynihan said.
"Some GCs want a J.D. in this role because they hold a pure standing with the practice group leaders," Moynihan said. "I firmly believe that other GCs recognize that it isn't about the person's background. The general counsel is the one who makes the difference."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Being a Profession is Not Malarkey
- 2Bring NJ's 'Pretrial Opportunity Program' into the Open
- 3High-Speed Crash With Police Vehicle Nets $1.6 Million Settlement
- 4Embracing a ‘Stronger Together’ Mentality: Collaboration Best Practices for Attorneys
- 5Selling Law. How to Get Hired, Paid and Rehired
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250