My News and Notes From 3 Days at Relativity Fest 2019
Three days at Relativity Fest reveals an e-discovery industry that's being embraced by Big Tech and is eager to expand to information governance, privacy and beyond.
October 23, 2019 at 02:20 PM
5 minute read
I've spent the past couple of days at Relativity Fest, the conference that started 10 years ago as a user conference for the Relativity e-discovery platform and has since morphed into a behemoth, complete with gospel choirs at the opening keynote and parties at Chicago's McCormick Place.
During the conference, I've sat in on a few sessions and talked with a number of people, looking for not only what's being announced, but what it means for an e-discovery industry that continues to expand in style and scope. Coverage of the keynote's big announcements and the judges' panel have already posted on Legaltech News, but here's what else I've found.
The Bug Bounty: Originally announced during the Opening Keynote, Relativity has started a "bug bounty," which the company claims is one of the first centered on e-discovery. The idea of a bug bounty is common in other industries, essentially crowdsourcing finding vulnerabilities in a given application or platform by providing financial rewards for anything that is found. In this case, Relativity is offering researchers invited to the program up to $3,000 for critical security flaws found in its software. These researchers will be provided their own workspace within the 10.2 version of RelativityOne and 700 documents of test data. It's an interesting idea, particularly as crowdsourcing has come more into vogue in general. For an e-discovery industry where sensitive data abounds, it makes sense as well.
All Aboard: Relativity also announced yesterday two new members to its board of directors: Shannon Brayton, chief marketing officer at LinkedIn, and Kevin Scott, chief technology officer at Microsoft. They both bring tech experience, to be sure, but their appointment also furthers a trend that LTN has been reporting on for a while: E-discovery is big business, and the rest of the tech community is beginning to see that. I've heard from more than one person since the appointment of new Relativity CEO Mike Gamson just how indicative it was that an exec from a big tech company like LinkedIn was interested in the e-discovery community, and recent funding—$83 million for DISCO! Nine figures for Exterro!—speaks for itself. I'm not going to claim that e-discovery companies are hitting Microsoft levels any time soon, but it's clear that those analyzing the industry are seeing growth opportunities. I'm curious about the ramifications as more people in the wider tech industry continue to pay attention.
The Hyphen: Yesterday, I participated in the "State of the e-Discovery Union" roundtable, where my team of three (including Mary Mack and Kelly Twigger) faced off against another team of three (Meribeth Banaschik, Ari Kaplan and Ryan O'Leary), with two retired jurists (James Francis, Andrew Peck) serving as, well, judges for the two team's arguments. The whole panel was a lot of fun, with discussions ranging on everything from whether current biometrics is too "creepy" to whether lawyers are technologically competent. But the question that got the room going the most was a simple one: What's your biggest issue with e-discovery? My favorite answer was Kaplan's: why, the hyphen in eDiscovery/e-discovery, of course! For the record, I'm pro-hyphen (my teammates were very anti-hyphen), but I might have to solicit some opinions on this one.
Beyond E-Discovery: I expanded upon this in my Editor's Picks newsletter this week (you should subscribe if you haven't!), but I was struck this week that for an e-discovery conference, a lot of my conversations tended to revolve around topics that weren't purely e-discovery. Last year saw Relativity roll out its Trace compliance product as an initial foray to expand the core platform's capabilities, and this year a number of Relativity's business partners are taking that ball and running with it. Special Counsel vice president Douglas Brush, for instance, told me that clients of his are now using RelativityOne as a data breach response tool, organizing and analyzing data similarly to the middle part of the EDRM. X1 CEO Craig Carpenter, meanwhile, said more companies he works with are collecting data for information governance purposes, since the methods for doing so utilize the same workflows.
Aussie Aussie Aussie: As it has the past couple of years, Relativity Fest closed with an awards ceremony for the company's Innovation Awards. There was the normal pomp and circumstance with the presentation (and my Philly area-raised self will never turn down a soft pretzel), but what really struck me is that two of the big winners came from the same city—half a world away from Chicago. Clayton Utz, who won the Community Choice award for Best Innovation with its AcquiRE platform using Relativity for tracking land acquisition data, is based in Sydney. iCourts, which won Best Innovation From a Solution Provider with its GoX iPad review app, is also Sydney-based. I charted the rise of Australia's legal tech scene in a feature earlier this year, and less than three years removed from the country's first major TAR case, it's clear that Australia is increasingly a market to watch for tech and innovation.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1King & Spalding Snags Restructuring Duo From Alston & Bird
- 228 Firms Supporting Retired Barnes & Thornburg Litigator in Georgia Supreme Court Malpractice Case
- 3Boosting Litigation and Employee Benefits Practices, Two Am Law 100 Firms Grow in Pittsburgh
- 4EMT Qualifies as 'Health Care Provider' Under Whistleblower Act, State Appellate Court Rules
- 5Bar Report - Feb. 3
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250