Millennial Clients Are Forcing Attorneys to Rethink Their Marketing Approach
For law firms, targeting the millennial demographic may be the key to reaching a much broader client base as a whole, but it may also require attorneys to rethink the way they use technology and market themselves online.
October 31, 2019 at 10:00 AM
4 minute read
Law firms are leveraging technology to drive a new approach to marketing that emphasizes humanity over bare-bones credentials, an effort that seems almost tailor-made to capture the attention of would-be millennial clients.
But are law firms really eager to target a millennial clientele? The answer might be both yes and no. Roy Sexton, director of marketing at Clark Hill, pointed out that millennials are changing the way that the generations that came before and after them are engaging with their phones, social media and other technologies.
In other words, reaching millennials could be parlayed into accessing the broader client market at large. For example, Sexton indicated that Clark Hill be redoing its website over the coming year in addition to revamping its brand.
"We need to put all of that in language that appeals, yes to millennials, but again, to millennials on the way toward appealing toward everyone else. And the manner in which millennials are reshaping our culture and the way we think, we have to keep an eye towards that," Sexton said.
And it's not just the business of the individual millennial client that firms need to be thinking about courting. Jill Huse, president-elect of the Legal Marketing Association, noted that millennials are also advancing to positions of corporate power inside corporate America.
"I think that a lot of law firms are exploring different ways to really attract these millennials," Huse said.
In large part, that means using social media platforms such as Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to inject more personality into the way that attorneys and firms have traditionally marketed themselves.
Sexton framed the change as going a step beyond establishing that an attorney is good at their job. Millennials—and by extent a law firm's potential audience as a whole—are looking to ascertain more about the type of person handling their legal business.
"They assume that you're a good lawyer. They want to see that you're a decent human being and that you're engaged in our world," Sexton said.
For example, Sexton might reshare posts or photos from a Clark Hill attorney who devotes their free time to cancer advocacy work across the firm's channels.
That kind of personalized approach to client engagement is echoed in a new feature from NextChapter, a company that has traditionally focused upon cloud-based solutions for preparing bankruptcy forms and was acquired by Fastcase in September.
NextChapter's new Modern Attorney Directory encourages its attorney clients to create profiles that share their social media handles, fun facts about themselves and whether or not they embrace alternative forms of payment like Venmo or Apple Pay.
Janine Sickmeyer, NextChapter's founder, said the directory was built to help people find attorneys who "work the way that they live," whether it's a willingness to meet via video chat or a shared hobby.
She thinks the feature will appeal particularly to millennials, who are accustomed to seeking out the people they work with on social media.
"I think that there are just a lot of different ways that millennials are looking for really professionals of all kinds. You see this with doctors and therapists," Sickmeyer said.
Still, courting millennial clients isn't all about the personal touch, and some of the other technologies at play may require more of an upfront investment of time and resources than opening a Instagram account.
Huse noted that podcasts in particular tend to attract a heavy millennial audience, but she has not seen many firms venture too far down that road yet, possibly because of the amount of attention that is required to successfully execute such a project.
But other efforts require less ongoing maintenance to sustain. Huse pointed to firms that have incorporated live chat features to their sites or the ability for clients to upload photos and documents.
One thing that still hasn't caught on inside law firms is Venmo or Apple Pay—yet.
"I think it will," Huse said. "I haven't actually seen that trend emerging, but I could certainly see where that would have a lot of credence moving forward."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250