Firms Are (Slowly) Friending Social Media Professionals
The question of how effective firms are being with the social media efforts may largely come down to the manpower they are willing to put behind a keyboard, especially as clients become too busy for face-to-face networking.
November 13, 2019 at 10:00 AM
4 minute read
Building and maintaining an effective social media strategy takes work, but the extent to which law firms are throwing bodies at the problem may still largely depend upon the size and scope of the organization.
A new Digital Marketing in Law Firms survey released last week by Calibrate Legal and Infinite Global collected input from roughly 100 law firm employees, the majority (68%) of whom indicated that they only had between one and five people on staff dedicated specifically to digital marketing.
When it comes to social media, however, some firms might have just gotten a little ahead of themselves.
Jennifer Scalzi, CEO of Calibrate Legal, said eight years ago she noticed that firms were hiring personnel specifically designated towards the handling of social media. But those platforms were still relatively young, and the need for that kind of attention wasn't quite there yet.
"It was just a little too soon, so those professionals wound up getting sucked into broader communications roles," Scalzi said.
Now the legal industry at large could be revisiting the need for roles specifically tailored towards managing online content, especially as firms seem to be embracing a more structured approach in general towards social media.
According to the Digital Marketing survey, 65% of respondents indicated their firms had instituted a social media policy, while 52% also identified the presence of a firm-wide social media strategy.
While those guidelines may not always be accompanied by a steady hand on the wheel, some firms have embraced the notion of taking a more organized approach to the use of social media.
Jennifer Manton, chief marketing and business development officer at Kramer Levin, said her firm not only has a digital content manager, but has engaged the services of an outside digital media content agency to help with them develop their strategy across platforms.
"You're absolutely seeing a rise in having a designated resource, I think for all digital content," Manton said.
However, Roy Sexton, director of marketing at Clark Hill, said it's still very rare that he comes across anyone in the legal industry whose job is entirely devoted to social media, chalking the instances where such a position might exist up to large firms.
That's not to say that smaller firms couldn't benefit from having a designated social media captain on staff too. Sexton pointed to engagements with platforms like LinkedIn that stretch beyond making the occasional post, such as following client activity, cross-promoting partner organizations or looking for online content ideas.
He thinks those activities could potentially prove more useful in reaching over-scheduled clients who have grown weary of face-to-face networking activities like golfing or three-hour dinners.
"People don't have the luxury of time to spend with us like they did once upon a time," Sexton said.
Still, reaching those same people on social media isn't always a given, and some firms remain squeamish about the possibility of leveraging more targeted advertising online. For example, while 61% of survey respondents said their digital marketing team spent time on organic social, only 8% indicated the same for paid social, which allows customers to essentially boost their post's reach on a platform.
Sexton thinks attorneys may be afraid of inadvertently violating American Bar Association guidelines around advertising.
"Because it's new, because it's uncertain, I think legal in particular shuts down around the paid piece of it," Sexton said.
But even if firms continue their organic social media push unabated, marketing professionals shouldn't count on having some of the more traditional event-related promotions being cleared from their plate any time soon. Manton said client entertainment is still very much part of the strategy at Kramer Levin.
"I don't think that social media will every really be a replacement for that one-on-one opportunity to build a relationship with someone," she said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250